RE: [Honeycomb] net.sourceforge.hivetranse.transaction.MandatoryT ransactionException

2006-04-24 Thread James Carman
ngs much simpler. But, there are those rare cases. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 9:52 AM To: 'Tapestry users' Subject: RE: [Honeycomb] net.sourceforge.hivetranse.transaction.MandatoryT ransactionException James,

RE: [Honeycomb] net.sourceforge.hivetranse.transaction.MandatoryT ransactionException

2006-04-24 Thread Schulte Marcus
ould work for a high > percentage, but not quite > 99%. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 6:19 AM > To: 'Tapestry users' > Subject: RE: [Honeycomb] > net.sourceforge.hivetranse.

RE: [Honeycomb] net.sourceforge.hivetranse.transaction.MandatoryT ransactionException

2006-04-24 Thread James Carman
gree that transaction-per-request would work for a high percentage, but not quite 99%. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 6:19 AM To: 'Tapestry users' Subject: RE: [Honeycomb] net.sourceforge.hivetranse.transaction.Mand

RE: [Honeycomb] net.sourceforge.hivetranse.transaction.MandatoryT ransactionException

2006-04-24 Thread Schulte Marcus
> and for me it also makes no sense to do so... > I've put Mandatory in and it still doesn't work: > > --- > No transaction available for Mandatory demarcation > --- yes, you'll have to manually setup a transaction at the beginning of the request and commit it afterwards. That's what mandatory me

Re: [Honeycomb] net.sourceforge.hivetranse.transaction.MandatoryT ransactionException

2006-04-24 Thread Andreas Bulling
On 24. Apr 2006 - 12:19:25, Schulte Marcus wrote: | And: it's completely pointless to have multiple hibernate session per | request (unless you have a very good reason and know what you do). So, you | should really declare all your methods "mandatory" (sorry, I was wrong | before). Then of course y

RE: [Honeycomb] net.sourceforge.hivetranse.transaction.MandatoryT ransactionException

2006-04-24 Thread Schulte Marcus
esentation of a subset (hopefully) of your db-entities. They *might* have been loaded in one DB-Transaction but they needn't be. > -Original Message- > From: Andreas Bulling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 11:50 AM > To: Tapestry users &

Re: [Honeycomb] net.sourceforge.hivetranse.transaction.MandatoryT ransactionException

2006-04-24 Thread Andreas Bulling
On 24. Apr 2006 - 09:10:32, Schulte Marcus wrote: | It seems that hivetranse implicitly marks the hibernate session methods | "mandatory", assuming that eache service using it uses at least "requires". | Which is basically sound. you might try to mark your HibernateSqueezer's | squeeze method with

RE: [Honeycomb] net.sourceforge.hivetranse.transaction.MandatoryT ransactionException

2006-04-24 Thread Schulte Marcus
It seems that hivetranse implicitly marks the hibernate session methods "mandatory", assuming that eache service using it uses at least "requires". Which is basically sound. you might try to mark your HibernateSqueezer's squeeze method with ta-required (however you do this in hivetranse). > -