e-
> From: Hugo Palma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 4:31 PM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: Honeycomb vs Tapernate or Honeycomb with Tapernate
>
>
> I agree that tapernate feels more hibernish then honeycomb.
>
> I guess the suggestio
cally using either
> > configurations or overriding service implementations. That's my vision
> > (and
> > the HiveMind vision), to create a vast library of these drop-in jars
> that
> > will enable certain features when added to your classpath. Of course,
> >
se,
> that's exactly what Howard's [EMAIL PROTECTED] project is all about.
> There's my $0.02.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hugo Palma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 9:55 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: Honeycomb vs T
rom: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:28 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Honeycomb vs Tapernate or Honeycomb with Tapernate
That's an excellent question :) You can get the actual library via the
public svn server at http://carmanconsulting.com/,
; will enable certain features when added to your classpath. Of course,
> > that's exactly what Howard's [EMAIL PROTECTED] project is all about.
> > There's my $0.02.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hugo Palma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> the HiveMind vision), to create a vast library of these drop-in jars
that
> will enable certain features when added to your classpath. Of course,
> that's exactly what Howard's [EMAIL PROTECTED] project is all about.
> There's my $0.02.
>
> -----Original Message-----
&g
; my
> HiveMind "object soup."
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Hugo Palma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 9:41 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: Honeycomb vs Tapernate or Honeycomb with Tapernate
>
> That's one
out.
There's my $0.02.
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Palma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 9:55 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Honeycomb vs Tapernate or Honeycomb with Tapernate
I see that. So what you're trying to say is that tapernate and honeyc
2006 9:41 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Honeycomb vs Tapernate or Honeycomb with Tapernate
That's one of the differences in implementation that i found. But i don't
see that as a something that will drive my choice, as long as i don't have
to use Spring IOC(hivemind will do just
rom: Hugo Palma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 9:41 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Honeycomb vs Tapernate or Honeycomb with Tapernate
That's one of the differences in implementation that i found. But i don't
see that as a something that will drive my choice, a
That's one of the differences in implementation that i found. But i don't
see that as a something that will drive my choice, as long as i don't have
to use Spring IOC(hivemind will do just fine) for me it's just another jar
in the classpath.
On 5/3/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On
One big difference is the usage of the Spring classes within Tapernate.
This is just a difference of opinion/direction.
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Palma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 9:04 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Honeycomb vs Tapernate or Honeycomb wit
12 matches
Mail list logo
