Re: Cayenne integration guidelines

2005-11-02 Thread Neil Pierson
I'm sure Eric meant 'stateful' instead of 'stateless'. On 11/1/05, Borut Bolčina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, you got me a bit confused here. See below. > > > > For stateless apps, each individual user has their own DataContext in > > the Visit object. > > Isn't visit (ASO session) the very

Re: Cayenne integration guidelines

2005-11-01 Thread Borut Bolčina
Hi, you got me a bit confused here. See below. Eric Schneider wrote: Borut, I've always stuck to the simplest approach. If I'm dealing with a completely stateless application, I share one DataContext for all users (in T4 as a hivemind singleton). So each request from browser (user) c

Re: Cayenne integration guidelines

2005-10-25 Thread Johan Maasing
Eric Schneider wrote: Borut, I've always stuck to the simplest approach. If I'm dealing with a completely stateless application, I share one DataContext for all users (in T4 as a hivemind singleton). For stateless apps, each individual user has their own DataContext in the Visit object.

Re: Cayenne integration guidelines

2005-10-25 Thread Eric Schneider
Borut, I've always stuck to the simplest approach. If I'm dealing with a completely stateless application, I share one DataContext for all users (in T4 as a hivemind singleton). For stateless apps, each individual user has their own DataContext in the Visit object. I haven't used the

Cayenne integration guidelines

2005-10-24 Thread Borut Bolčina
Hi, I searched through the archives and read all that I could about integrating Cayenne with Tapestry. The latest thread "Tapestry, Cayenne and Squeezer" was informative, especially Filip's post which is on wiki also. All other posts were a bit out of date I think dealing with T3. Although re