RE: [tapernate] Session-Per-Conversation...

2006-05-04 Thread James Carman
Oh, that would be an option. Right now, you do the transaction demarcation in your hivemodule.xml file. -Original Message- From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 1:56 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: [tapernate] Session-Per-Conversation... I mainly wrote

Re: [tapernate] Session-Per-Conversation...

2006-05-03 Thread Mark
I mainly wrote that because you were thinking about annotations for the transaction demarcation... James Carman wrote: I'll have to look at it, but I don't know that I use any 1.5-specific features. I think I only have one place where I use a "typed" collection (in the persistence strategy), b

RE: [tapernate] Session-Per-Conversation...

2006-05-03 Thread Konstantin Ignatyev
tantin Iignatyev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 2:04 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: [tapernate] Session-Per-Conversation... Spring Hibernate Template is the truly horrible piece of code that should be removed from Spring codebase. Please read the blog http://houseofhaug.ne

RE: [tapernate] Session-Per-Conversation...

2006-05-03 Thread James Carman
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 1:51 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: [tapernate] Session-Per-Conversation... > And, if you don't join a conversation, you just take part in the general > conversation (which is only request-scoped). But, this would clutter up th

RE: [tapernate] Session-Per-Conversation...

2006-05-03 Thread Jim Steinberger
What technical arguments from that blog-thread do you find so compelling? -Original Message- From: Konstantin Iignatyev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 2:04 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: [tapernate] Session-Per-Conversation... Spring Hibernate Template is

Re: [tapernate] Session-Per-Conversation...

2006-05-02 Thread Konstantin Iignatyev
Spring Hibernate Template is the truly horrible piece of code that should be removed from Spring codebase. Please read the blog http://houseofhaug.net/blog/archives/2005/08/12/hibernate-hates-spring/ and check technical arguments, have to filter out emotions though. Spring Has much nicer and

Re: [tapernate] Session-Per-Conversation...

2006-05-02 Thread Mark
And, if you don't join a conversation, you just take part in the general conversation (which is only request-scoped). But, this would clutter up the code with these join/end conversation requests. I'd like to use annotations for this, but haven't come up with a nice way of doing so. I might b

RE: [tapernate] Session-Per-Conversation...

2006-05-02 Thread James Carman
t a demo application that I have on my own SVN server. I'll try to set it up soon, I promise. James -Original Message- From: Henri Dupre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:00 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: [tapernate] Session-Per-Conversation... What is the

Re: [tapernate] Session-Per-Conversation...

2006-05-02 Thread Henri Dupre
What is the homepage of the tapernate project? It sounds really great. On 5/2/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All, I've removed support (well, it wasn't really supporting it anyway) for session-per-conversation in Tapernate. I would like to make it much more robust, allowing for

[tapernate] Session-Per-Conversation...

2006-05-02 Thread James Carman
All, I've removed support (well, it wasn't really supporting it anyway) for session-per-conversation in Tapernate. I would like to make it much more robust, allowing for "named" conversations. I need to figure out a nice, clean way to declare what conversation an action is supposed to take part