Since we're on the topic, does anyone know the pros and cons of the proxy
approach vs the mod_jk approach?
On 2/15/06, Jeff Lubetkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Apologies for the delay. This is now on the wiki at
> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tapestry/SpeclessPagesInWEB-INF.
>
That's a great bit of information. Thanks!
ot; your
> product to a product id and unsqueezes it by getting it back from the
> database. Then you can actually just pass the Product object as an
> argument without it being to heavy. See:
> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tapestry/DataSqueezer
> for how to write a DataSqueezer.
&g
Forgive the "newbness" of this question, but I'm just curious. Let's say if
have a page class similar to the following:
public class ProductPage extends BasePage{
private Product product
public getProduct(){return product;}
public setProduct(Product product){this.product=product;}
@Injec
On 1/31/06, Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We moved the discussion away from this list.
>
> This goes for everyone, any other issues related with Tapidea please use
> the Tapidea forum.
>
I don't see a link to a forum at the tapidea.javaforge.com site. Am I
missing it?
in manager with IDEA 5.0.2 with the
> 0.2release when i comes out.
>
> So it should work fine with 5.0.2 and newer versions.
>
> Cheers
>
> Hugo
>
>
>
> On 18/01/06, Matt Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I want to make sure I understand. Th
I want to make sure I understand. This plugin is only usable on the EAP
versions of Idea? That would be a shame. I strongly discourage anyone on my
team from using EAPs. We've just had too many problems in the past.
On 1/16/06, Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This has been fixed for vers
On 12/28/05, Kalle Korhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (+Tapestry; though it still feels complex - must be the years with
> Struts/JSF that have cluttered my brain :).
>
I don't think it's the Struts/JSF clutter that make Tapestry feel complex. I
never used either of those and I find it comple
We use 1.5 for all new development, so +1 here.
Matt Welch
On 11/15/05, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We'll have to see where Wicket goes, but anyone who has worked on
> Tapestry 4.0, with its extensive support for injection, will certainly
> find that somewhat missing in Wicket's simpler model.
Is there a thread somewhere or some documen
them in your .page (for page classes) or .jwc (for
> component classes) xml specifications.
>
> Ofcause, if you wish your head to spin real bad you can also mix all
> three :)
>
>
> ציטוט Matt Welch:
> > On 11/15/05, Ron Piterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> &
On 11/15/05, Ron Piterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are right, component annotations are clumsy. But, currently there
> are 3 ways to define a component in a page - you might find .jwc or
> .html way more apealing, and still use annotations for injecting or
> setting defaults - that way you
thing in it and it's not quite was
I was expecting.
Matt Welch
On 11/14/05, Robert Zeigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you're looking for a code-intensive framework, you might try wicket
> (http://wicket.sourceforge.net) or click (http://click.sourceforge.net).
> I haven&#
anges to core framework needed?
Again, I'm pretty new to Tapestry so it may be that I'll get used to
such heavy annotations/XML in time, so take this for what it is: a
newb's first impressions.
Matt Welch
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=36654
In the above referenced thread there is a reference to the TSS having some
serious issues with the perfromance and UI of their site and that they will
soon be moving to an all new codebase. Wasn't it pretty recently that TSS
relaunched u
This is fantastic news! I love the Sourcebeat model and have two
current book subscriptions with them already. I'm looking forward to
adding this one to my virtual library.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
> Not that you have to do everything Sun says but I would guess that the
> current
> Tapestry name conventions do seem a bit strange to many Java developers.
"A bit strange" indeed. It may be ridiculous, but I find that it slows
me down noticeably when I'm forced to use the "I" and "_variable"
n
17 matches
Mail list logo
