list that supporting 4.x is
> very
> >> different than supporting 3.x. And now that 5.0 is being written that
> >> will not be backward compatible with 4.x or 3.x, it makes me wonder if
> 4.xis worth the effort? I don't know if he can get it done before
> >>
Tyi, Spindle for T4 is in a deep coma, dying a very slow death! ;-)
F
On 4/10/06, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know if spindle for T4 is still under development ? - the
> spindle blog says "on vacancy from 24th on..." and the mailing list also
> has
> no big
Except startup issues (which I personally don't consider as big issue) I
don't see any real issue that could disqualify Tap 4 as production quality
software. You should be convinced by the extensive unit tests effort that
were put into Tap 4 development. We're currently using it in a production
env
Hi Geoff,
How could you be sure he has Kent's book? In any case you're doing a good
job for Kent. :-)
F
On 3/3/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> EWDWT (Kent Tong's book) talks about this in chapter 15 p.468
>
> Geoff
>
> On 3/2/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd
, though. Right now,
> it's
> not that easy to extend (writing interceptor factories).
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Francis Amanfo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 4:25 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: anyone buy Kent's Tapestry
On 3/2/06, Raul Raja Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 in "Enjoying Frameworks Development with Hivemind"
> :)
Halt dreaming, man. I wonder if there is any publisher that would want to
offer a contract for writing a book on a relatively unknown framework like
Hivemind.
F
John Coleman
On 3/2/06, John Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if Kent has a formal background in education, but his methods
> are solid. I've read a lot of geek crud over the years, which make it
> painful to learn.
>
> Kent obeys 3 very good rules;
> -Start at the beginning and assume nothin
;s not in a ban list yet?
>
> On 2/22/06, Ron Piterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Francis Amanfo wrote:
> > > So, is watching porno what you do after a hard day's Tapestry work? :)
> > after ? during !
> > ron
> >
> > >
> > &g
And your boss pays you for watching that thing during work? You must be
living in a paradise. :-)
Francis
On 2/22/06, Ron Piterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Francis Amanfo wrote:
> > So, is watching porno what you do after a hard day's Tapestry work? :)
&
So, is watching porno what you do after a hard day's Tapestry work? :)
Francis
On 2/21/06, Ron Piterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> yes - they are free, but quite old, I saw them already 2-3 years ago... ;)
> ron
>
>
> -
> To
I saw the message:
Zillow at restThen comes my question: Is Zillow fallen in a deep coma dying
a slow death already? :)
Francis
On 2/8/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Alas, all I'm seeing is "down for maintenance".
>
> On 2/8/06, kranga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Nice sit
Hi Vincent,
I've done exactly this before and it worked for me. In other words placing
1
in web.xml in the WEB-INF of my application worked.
Francis
On 2/3/06, Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is anyone also met this kind of situation?
>
> On 1/21/06, Vincent <[EMA
Excellent job, Mat. Your my favorite! :)
On 2/2/06, Mat Gessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I thought I would share my experience customizing Eclipse/Web Tools
> Platform for Tapestry 4 development. I wrote up a How-To which you can
> see on the Tapestry wiki under HowTos:
>
> http:/
Hi Cui,
Don't even dream of it. There is currently no Spindle for Tap 4. Regarding
spindle for Tap 4, don't even dream to have a real bite into the meat before
end of 3rd quater of 2006. You could do without it though.
F
On 2/1/06, Cui, Fanzhe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> According the Spindle
Hi Mitch,
This seems to be the LONGEST email I've seen in my long Internet life. I
think you must be entered into the guiness book of records! :)
F
On 1/15/06, Mitch Christow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> Thanks for your help. I moved the hivemodule.xml file into the WEB-INF
> fol
urse and little useless
> blathering. This is the closest I've seen the list has ever come to a
> flame war. (if you except the JBOSS dude's post years ago).
>
> If Howard said something dumb, he'll get it and make it right.
>
> Geoff
>
> On 1/10/06, Francis Amanfo &
Howard,
You also said "No bashing of other frameworks." yet you went ahead and did
exactly that with this post at TSS:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=38407#196558
That's not nice.
F
On 1/9/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please visit the article,
>
Howard,
This is really cheating! We are all grown ups and need no suggetions as to
how we should compose our e-mails. We are not babies that need to be spoon
fed.
F
On 1/9/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please visit the article,
> http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.ts
I disagree with you on the point that there is no html in wicket. Aren't you
confusing yourself with the Echo framework? Wicket has the same templating
concept as Tapestry but unlike Tapestry there are no configuration files.
Every page is mapped onto a Java class.
Having done production applicat
Your link has content type application/rss+xml. Could you provide us a
readable link?
Francis
On 11/24/05, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://www.jroller.com/rss/glongman
>
> Geoff
>
> On 11/24/05, Francis Amanfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
Geoff,
While here could you finally make a comment as to when we might expect
Spindle for Tapestry 4? There have been a couple of questions about this on
this list that went unanswered.
We appreciate your hardwork on such a great product.
Francis
On 11/24/05, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
I don't think this poll is about Tapestry users but the question says: What
Web framework will your next project use? I guess the majority on this list
are already using Tapestry. So don't go vote just for the sake of using
Tapestry.
Francis
On 11/2/05, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Hi,
Though not Tapestry but directly related to it I decided to provide
you a link to a discussion going on at theserverside.com. Maybe this is
interesting to some of you. The link is:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=33209#165962
regards,
Francis
-
IMHO the easiest
way to create great web applications.
Bernd
On 12.04.2005, at 23:26 Uhr, Francis Amanfo wrote:
Well, is the site really created with the Tapestry framework? Where is the
proof then? It is a characteristic of a typical Tapestry site that the
content attribute has as value the versio
Well, is the site really created with the Tapestry framework? Where is the
proof then? It is a characteristic of a typical Tapestry site that the
content attribute has as value the version of Tapestry you used for
development. For example at my site you have:
in the head tag.
There isn't anythi
Being a presentation framework, I think it would be a bad idea to let
Tapestry fiddle with such logic. Remember some applications would be
just happy with those leading and trailing whitespaces. It's up to your
logic layer to take care of such issues.
Therefore I think you should be doing those
Dear Tapestry aficionados,
IBM has decided to bundle Tapestry with the next major release of its
application development environment, IBM WSAD 6.0. They claim they have
done extensive research on several open source web frameworks and found Tapestry to be
the best and superior in this area. They
27 matches
Mail list logo
