For me I'm not interested in a soup to nuts framework. If I was, I'd
be running on .net, Websphere, or JBoss. For me at least, I'd rather
tapestry were a *smoking good* web gui framework, than a "quite good" full
featured framework. In other words I'd like it to be narrowly focused but
rea
Personally I am excited about the prospects of HiveMind and Tapestry
together. I am relatively new to Tapestry but I work on large systems.
Tapestry in its current version is a nice web GUI. However, Tapestry +
HiveMind starts to look like a powerful application framework for
building big complicat
Schulte Marcus bmw.ch> writes:
> Still, the way you have to unwrap your exception from the
> ApplicationRuntimeException is somewhat unsatisfactory. It's just too tight
> coupling to framework-internals.
I suppose your user exceptions are checked exceptions? If
no, just override the activateExc
neovera.com> writes:
> My question is -- does anyone see a problem with this? I was just concered
> that
> the method might not exit until the next page is rendered which I suppose
> could
> lead to some scalability issues under heavy user load.
No. The cycle.activate() method will exit al
Henry Chen gmail.com> writes:
Try:
ServletContext context =
cycle.getRequestContext().getServlet().getServletContext();
String somefile = "/abc.zip";
//String outFileName = context.getResource(somfile).getFile();
String outFileName = context.getRealPath(somfile);
As you're trying to write to
Anyway... the point is, like ASP.NET, tapestry provides the framework
and inner-workings to create the components; it's up to you to create
the dazzling components.
.NET does a lot more OOB than tapestry currently does though. Just looking
at my .net debugger here, the OOB .NET package includes
Robert Zeigler wrote:
Karthik Abram wrote:
Checkout componentart.com's product lineup (checkout the demos for the
components) - ASP.NET is the real competition.
I've said it before and I'll say it again - Tapestry 4.0's focus & direction
is, in my opinion wrong. People will use Tapestry if it pr
I beg to differ - the framework's support for building components is still
lacking and the core team would be adding more value by rolling out core
components. I'm not saying plug n play layers is a bad idea. Just because
something sounds good/technically cool/etc. isn't reason enough to do it.
Y
If you have an unknown list of checkboxes, then put a hidden field before
the list of checkboxes and bind the value to a list property . This way the
right number of checkboxes will be preserved on form post.
-Original Message-
From: Shalini Seth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Karthik Abram wrote:
> Checkout componentart.com's product lineup (checkout the demos for the
> components) - ASP.NET is the real competition.
>
> I've said it before and I'll say it again - Tapestry 4.0's focus & direction
> is, in my opinion wrong. People will use Tapestry if it provides compone
You could do something like:
Assign an internal identifier to each checkbox by setting its name
property.
Look for your internal identifiers during a directlink by manually
reading from the servlet e.g.
Enumeration en =
cycle.getRequestContext().getRequest().getP
Hi Karthik,
The checkboxes are rendered based on values from the database.
So they do not have a fixed number. Rendering them is not a problem.
Since the state changes after render, on formsubmit the server does not
know.
Shalini
-Original Message-
From: Karthik Abram [mailto:[EMAIL
Checkout componentart.com's product lineup (checkout the demos for the
components) - ASP.NET is the real competition.
I've said it before and I'll say it again - Tapestry 4.0's focus & direction
is, in my opinion wrong. People will use Tapestry if it provides components
of dizzying complexity and
Hey Shalini,
Can you not put the checkboxe's value (Boolean) in an List and use a
foreach to render them? If the number of your checkboxes will not change,
this is the easiest solution. When the form posts, the boolean values will
be set based on the checkbox states.
-Original Message
This is an example in which is possible to reproduce the "lock after
commit" problem.
It happens when you do a click over the button "Accion 1"
and immediately you do another click over de button "Accion 2",
What's going on…
well Tapestry is trying to resolve the first request when the brows
Hi Pablo,
It doesn't exist in the Tapestry or contrib frameworks, but it's pretty
simple to implement one. I created one for an app I'm writing. It's very
reusable. I can send it to you if you like.
Cheers!
Denis
-Original Message-
From: Pablo Ruggia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: quin
Hi,
I have a form that renders multiple checkboxes. On FormSubmit I write
whatever I have checked to a javascript component.
Once that is done I write to the service parameters and the save is
called. Is there any other way this can be done?
Is there a ideal way of sending the values of checkb
Does exists a ValidTextArea ?
Thanks !!!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/5/05, Kunal Ashar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...if my app requires data to persist or be passed across sessions, would
> pages be better suited than components?
Pages and Components are View entities. They may need to track some
light state, but the sort of data you seem to be describing b
Hello,
I've already posted this message a few days before, but since I got no
reply, I'd like to try once more... Sorry if this occurs to You as
spamming...
I've been trying to deploy my simple Tapestry app into Sun Java
Application Server (version 8 2005Q1), but I've run into some problems.
W
This doesn't work. Even getResource(contextPath) doesn't work.
-Original Message-
From: Ivano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 10:33 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Problem with ServletContext.getResource()
Could it be:
String somefile = contextPath + File.sep
Thanks, Reusability is definitely one.
Would another be the ability to be self-contained? The difference between
reusability and self-contained seems blurred, but I'm looking at it from the
point-of-view of data.
How easy or difficult (or architecturally correct!) is it to pass (persist)
data
I've just written down in by blog some thoughts on customizing the
contrib:Table component.
I would be glad to hear your comments.
Andreas Andreou
http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 08:11 +, Kent Tong wrote:
> John Anderson semiosix.com> writes:
>
> > Thanks for your suggestion. I tried that, but the Global class seems to
> > be destroyed every time one of the .class files in the app changes.
>
> But it will not be recreated until an http request h
Could it be:
String somefile = contextPath + File.separator + "abc.zip";
or about the same:
String somefile = contextPath +"/abc.zip";
Henry Chen wrote:
Hi,
I want to write to a file. I use the following method:
String contextPath =
cycle.getRequestContext().getRequest().getContextPath();
Servlet
As far as I know a first discriminator should be reusability:
- components should focus on characteristics related to his own
features and scope, in this way they can be reused in several contexts
(different pages, embedded in other components...)
- pages are usually more specific in their
Hi,
I want to write to a file. I use the following method:
String contextPath =
cycle.getRequestContext().getRequest().getContextPath();
ServletContext context =
cycle.getRequestContext().getServlet().getServletContext();
String somefile = contextPath +"abc.zip";
String outFileName = con
Yeah, I knew that component could implement PageRenderListener, but it woud
be triggered in the time when page starts to render, and not when component
starts to render.
I have 2 problems with using PageRenderListener in components as pre-render
"initialization" method :
1. parameters are not set i
Are there are guidelines or user experiences out there that help users decide
when to use pages and when to use components?
In my project, I'm trying to find the right reason(s) for developers to develop
a page instead of a component or vice versa, instead of arbitrarily selecting
one or the ot
Well, PageRenderListener works on both components and pages.
In 4.0, there isn't such an explicit "parameters are set" stage; the
generated bytecode for connected parameter properties is smarter and
more dynamic and there's no reflection (outside of OGNL). You invoke
getMyParameter() and it gets
On May 5, 2005, at 2:09 AM, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
On 5/4/05, Patrick Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You could do something similar to the DOM writers out
there though
and offer a "prettyprint" flag (false by default) that adds
inserts and
newlines to make the output more human reada
On 5/5/05, Ivano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you have a glimpse at Trail?
> https://trails.dev.java.net/
> It should be well suited to your needs, since you stated you need a
> typical db app.
Actually this app (and all my apps) are not data driven, of course i
use a db back end but my dev m
Did you have a glimpse at Trail?
https://trails.dev.java.net/
It should be well suited to your needs, since you stated you need a
typical db app.
Massimo Lusetti wrote:
I've been lurking on the list for a while now and it's time for me to
start porting a real app based on XMLC to Tapestry
The app
I've been lurking on the list for a while now and it's time for me to
start porting a real app based on XMLC to Tapestry
The app is a typical CRUD web app backed up by a typical db, the app
use hibernate.
My first start was to look for a typical structure and have looked at
spindle wizard (as I'm u
John Anderson semiosix.com> writes:
> Thanks for your suggestion. I tried that, but the Global class seems to
> be destroyed every time one of the .class files in the app changes.
But it will not be recreated until an http request hits your app again.
--
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 01:01 +, Kent Tong wrote:
> John Anderson semiosix.com> writes:
>
> > What I don't like is that every time I change something in the .java
> > files for the project, I have to wait 8-15 seconds for the restart to
> > happen. Which adds up to lots of what when it's part
36 matches
Mail list logo