Re: [Tagging] Dancing school

2010-08-17 Thread Surly_ru
> >> amenity=school > >> school=dance > > -1, IMHO no. A dancing school, boxing school, ski school, etc. are > IMHO not in the same category than general-education schools. They > might be classified in one category, but that is IMHO not school. I agree!! The term "training" here is much more sui

Re: [Tagging] Dancing school

2010-08-17 Thread Surly_ru
> Wouldn't that be a little counter initiative since they are called > dance schools, driving school, etc ? These short-term training courses for adults are very different from educational schools for children, despite of their name. So let's don't mix them.

Re: [Tagging] shop=kiosk

2010-10-18 Thread SURLY_ru
> I agree too to the actual shop=kiosk system, since it refers to what is > actually sold at certain places > "a little shop selling cigarettes, newspapers, sweets, snacks and beverages" I strongly disagree. "shop=kiosk" is a very strange kind of tag. It says all about design of a shop, but says

Re: [Tagging] "new" highway tag for small and informal footpaths; trail

2010-10-22 Thread SURLY_ru
> highway=path is indeed what would currently be used for informal > footpaths. But it can also be used to describe intentionally built, well > maintained and paved ways. Intentionally built way, too narrow for 4-wheel vehicles, is "highway=footway". Unintentional, informal way is "highway=path".

Re: [Tagging] Towing service?

2011-01-07 Thread Surly_ru
> > I agree that shop=workshop, workshop= is a good solution to > > this issue. > +1, it could be combined with craft to map the kind of workshop. I think, "craft=*" (may be with "man_made=works") is sufficient. So "shop=workshop" is redundant, and we need no such tag combination. _