[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - drinkable

Hallo, the tag "drinkable=" is used more than 3000 times. Up today there is no clear definition about the values of this tag. I made a proposal with some possible values, according to some discussions in this mailinglist and some threads in the osm forum. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pr

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - drinkable

Am 27.02.2014 15:28:13 schrieb(en) Vincent Pottier: > What about drinking_water used also more than 3000 times ? > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/drinkable (~3300) > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/drinking_water (~3100) > > It seems that today "drinkable=*" is on "standalone wateri

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - drinkable

I'm thinking about transfering my proposal "drinkable" to a new proposal "drinking_water". The proposed values can be the same. This means migration of "drinkable=yes/no" to "drinking_water=yes/no". The new tagging-scheme use one tag for standalone features that can provide drinking water and t

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - drinkable

y of drinking water. In the future the tag "drinkable=" can be deprecated. Comments are welcome. Rudolf Am 27.02.2014 07:18:57 schrieb(en) Rudolf Martin: > Hallo, > > the tag "drinkable=" is used more than 3000 times. > > Up today there is no clear definit

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - drinking_water

Hi, according to the discussion in the mailinglist I cancel the former proposal "drinkable" and start a new proposal "drinking_water". We can transfer "drinkable=" to "drinking_water=". The future tagging- scheme will have only one tag to indicate the existence and quality of drinking water. I

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - drinking_water

schrieb(en) Rudolf Martin: > Hi, > > according to the discussion in the mailinglist I cancel the former > proposal "drinkable" and start a new proposal "drinking_water". > > We can transfer "drinkable=" to "drinking_water=". The future

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - drinking_water

Today I start the voting. Voters are welcome. Rudolf Am 02.04.2014 22:18:07 schrieb(en) Rudolf Martin: > Hi, > > according to the discussion in the mailinglist I cancel the former > proposal "drinkable" and start a new proposal "drinking_water". >

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - drinking_water

Today I start the voting. Voters are welcome. Rudolf http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/drinking_water ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leaf_type and leaf_cycle

Hi all, there are several tags to indicate vegetation with leaves, e.g. "landuse=forest", "natural=wood", "natural=scrub", "natural=tree" and others. Today we have one additional key "wood=" to describe the type of leaves. This key is arguable. The oxford dictionary says: "wood = 1. The hard

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - leaf_type and leaf_cycle

Hi all, I startet the voting for the proposal: - "leaf_type=*" describes the type of leaves, such as broadleaved or needleleaved. - "leaf_cycle=*" describes the phenology of leaves, such as evergreen or deciduous. Please give your vote at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - leaf_type and leaf_cycle

--Reminder-- The voting to "leaf_type" and "leaf_cycle" ends next friday. See: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/leaftype Rudolf ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - leaf_type and leaf_cycle

point is the changing of elements that you have mapped yourself. Rudolf Am 23.05.2014 18:36:35 schrieb(en) Rudolf Martin: > I startet the voting for the proposal: > - "leaf_type=*" describes the type of leaves, such as broadleaved or > needleleaved. > - "leaf_cyc

Re: [Tagging] Leaf type of "palm" for leaf_type

I oppose this suggestion.   The key:leaf_type should be as simple as possible. Palms are included in leaf_type=broadleaved.   The values relate to the Land Cover Classification System (LCCS) by FAO. I don't know any classification systems with leaf_type=palm.   To refine the tagging you can

Re: [Tagging] Leaf type of "palm" for leaf_type

+1     Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. März 2015 um 08:13 Uhr Von: "Lukas Sommer" An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Leaf type of "palm" for leaf_type There are 533 413 elements with the “leaf_type” key. Only 83 of them have the value “palm”. This are 0.0156 % an

Re: [Tagging] Leaf type of "palm" for leaf_type

Perhaps we can find a general simple tagging for palms.   key:genus and key:species expect the scientific name of a plant. These are normaly not known to non-botanists.   "taxon:en=palm" may be a good solution, although I would prefer "taxon=palm". Unfortunable the latter don't fit to the taxo