Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - More Consistency in Railway Tagging

2013-04-13 Thread Rovastar
I too think that tracks should just be a single lane. From the reasons stated above put more by Kytömaa Lauri more eloquently than I will. If a road has a physical split it is 2 separate one way streets. Tracks are physically separate so they should be mapped as such. Roads and the crossings of mu

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - More Consistency in Railway Tagging

2013-04-13 Thread Rovastar
Martin, The example you gave for tunnels and bridges are the same for roads as well. If you have a bridge or tunnel with 2 roads (one for each one-way) and a train line(s) and footpath each will be a tagged with a separate bridge. So in that regard rail is actually are consistent with the road net

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - More Consistency in Railway Tagging

2013-04-14 Thread Rovastar
I think Martin it is best to focus your proposal on the area that is manageable, smaller in scale and something that your know and have passion about. So in this case I would just do a something for trams. I think the initial problems with the proposal was it was radical and effected millions of

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - More Consistency in Railway Tagging

2013-04-14 Thread Rovastar
Apologies I looked a little more at the San Fran area link you post you do have relations for the tram (which you added as tram yesterday...) as a road combo just not for each line of the trams which is tagged as light_rail. Which I presume it is just a tram line and therefore wrong anyway. I can

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - More Consistency in Railway Tagging

2013-04-14 Thread Rovastar
Now I started looking at trams and lightrail I see more of a need of consistent standards. They seem to be used interchangeably in San Fran and in Portland which was quoted a good example in the US most (nearly all) of what I would call tram lines are tagged light_rail with some tagged as trams li

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - More Consistency in Railway Tagging

2013-04-14 Thread Rovastar
It seems that the terms light rail and tram are used interchangeably around the world so mostly ignore my last comments. I don't know where this leave OSM tagging standards for them though. In the UK we do class them as different and it just show my sheltered life and knowledge on this subject.

Re: [Tagging] Recreation_ground (landuse vs leisure)

2013-05-27 Thread Rovastar
I was going to enter a long rambling rant about this subject against the anti-"mechanical edits" gang (part of the anti-import and anti-aerial imagery groups)it seems like some of them just like bad data and no standards. But a simple +1 to Tobias' comments. Crazy guidelines in the Mechanical