On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 13:52, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:00 PM, grin wrote:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/illegal
> 1) "illegal" is not really a category of things. It's an attribute,
Yes it is. If proposing an attribute should have a different fo
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:18, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 3/29/2011 6:04 AM, Peter Gervai wrote:
>>> I would like to propose a few additions:
>>> landuse=residential illegal=yes: residence of an illegal immigrant
>>
>> No, it would be houses built on someone el
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 15:21, Bill Ricker wrote:
> Under the usual rule-of-thumb, to map what's visible on the ground
> (signed or built),
Like smoothness=, incline=, etc?
> "Illegal use", in those words or similar. (Or tagged so by a suitably
> free Govt GIS file.)
Incidentally sometimes that
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 19:53, Richard Welty wrote:
> which half is which from year to year. so do you want to map fields
> as legal ownership, which is one boundary, or as sections which are
> planted differently from each other, which is another?
Not making a problem about subject ;-) I think
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:59, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Peter Gervai wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 15:21, Bill Ricker wrote:
>>> Under the usual rule-of-thumb, to map what's visible on the ground
>>> (signed
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 13:56, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> Peter> First, it's not simple and measurable, at least I really wonder how
> Peter> many of us measured an incline which isn't signed (I have tried, takes
> Peter> time and a bit of math, and I don't even play it for most of the
> Peter> ca
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 15:45, McGuire, Matthew
wrote:
>>>Serge> 2. Carries a lot of weight. It's a serious thing to accuse
>>>Serge> someone/something of being illegal.
>
>>Peter>I disagree, please help to find a different word then.
> How about, "de facto", "unofficial", "unauthorized" or "info
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 01:09, Dave F. wrote:
> Guessing has no place in OSM.
What about smoothness? tracktype? (operator for that matter? how many
checks official company papers?)
> Please take advice from the vast majority of repliers & drop this proposal.
I'm taking slowly, but still got posi
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 13:50, Dave F. wrote:
> what part of "illegal" is subjective? IMHO it is quite objective: anything
> against the law is "illegal".
>
> There are many disagreements where land area or borders are contested with
> each side claiming it illegal. They can't both be right.
>
> M
