Fellow mappers,
on behalf of osmuser63783, I am proposing
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Continuous_crossings
A tag for mapping continuous sidewalks/crossings as discussed on the
forums here:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/continuous-footways-sidewalks-pavements/104410
Th
On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 00:53 +0100, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> What I am after is tagging the dimension of mini-roundabouts. This seems
> to be useful information for longer vehicles. The specific mini-roundabout
> that triggered the question is this one, and it has a diameter of about
> 12m, and, yes,
On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 09:44 +0100, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> The mm is because it's intended do describe water tubes and pipe threads,
> and not roads. That is why I have doubts using it for the mini-roundabout.
The Wiki-page for diameter explicitly mentions the use for turning_circle
and turning_lo
On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 04:31 +0100, Matija Nalis wrote:
> If the actual issue is that HGV cannot pass some road, why not simply
> mark it as `hgv=no`? Besides being simple, it has the additional
> advantage that routers will actually already use it and direct HGVs
> somewhere where they can actually
On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 08:58 +0200, Jens Glad Balchen via Tagging wrote:
> The status quo for "car" roads in Norway seems to be that state roads
> are highway=motorway or highway=trunk, county roads are
> highway=primary
> or highway=secondary, and municipal roads are highway=tertiary and so
> on.
On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 09:59 +0200, Jens Glad Balchen via Tagging wrote:
> That does seem to capture it when used on roads. I see it's mostly
> used
> for private roads. Is this tag use undisputed if used with
> national/state/county/municipal? E.g. do people object to it being
> redudant?
I thin
