Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

2017-03-24 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:03:47 +0100 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > On 23 Mar 2017, at 17:23, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: > > > > - highway=stop+direction=forward node on the incoming way... Only > > covers the simple case but covers it simply > > > while this

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

2017-03-24 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:15:41 +0100 yo paseopor wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > > On 23 Mar 2017, at 17:23, Jean-Marc Liotier > > > wrote: > > > > > > - highway=stop+direction=forward node on the incoming way

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

2017-03-24 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:22:44 -0700 Tod Fitch wrote: > > It is not clear what we have gained by spitting the original topic > into multiple parts. Nothing... Had I been aware of the other thread I would probably not have started this one ! Oh well... 'git merge' for mailing list messages ? _

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign relevant direction: relation type:enforcement vs. direction=* vs. traffic_signals:direction=*

2017-03-27 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:08:55 +0200 Topographe Fou wrote: > > When you say direction=forward I assume it is forward/backward and > not other direction values. Yes. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listin

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign relevant direction: relation type:enforcement vs. direction=* vs. traffic_signals:direction=*

2017-03-27 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
(Sent again, this time without all the cc: which probably are the cause of the previous attempt being held in the listserv's spam filters... After eleven hours I guess it won't be delivered to the list so I resend) On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:08:13 +0100 yo paseopor wrote: > > I would start a "definit

Re: [Tagging] Power Tower Landuse = ?

2017-06-30 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:37:52 +0900 John Willis wrote: > > Which landuse is appropriate for power towers? > > here is a picture of some of the towers I am talking about. In this > case, most are in or adjacent to a substation.The giant red-white > towers in the picture are common in my area, and

Re: [Tagging] shop=fashion

2017-08-30 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
(late message because antispam rejected before) On 2017-08-29 19:27, Severin Menard wrote: > > In French-speaking African countries, this generic word is massively > used for the most generic shop by far: a small convenience store, > selling food and non food items all over the walls, up to the >

Re: [Tagging] shop=fashion shop=boutique

2017-09-01 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
I still don't understand the need for anything other than shop=clothes used with assorted modifiers. Fashion is subjective and I do not see why exclusive distribution channels should be tagged differently as they are essentially clothes shop with no price tags and an attitude. shop=car covers both

Re: [Tagging] Tagging data where position is not yet known

2017-09-04 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Sun, 3 Sep 2017 22:35:04 +0100 wrote: > [..] > I want to know how you feel about adding the market and water_pump > data that does not yet exist on the map. In Africa the existence of a > market and/or a water_pump is not only important information for the > locals, it is important information

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=clothes subtags

2017-09-06 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 13:40:16 +0200 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > my favorite one is this: > http://www.23hq.com/dieterdreist/photo/7089481?album_id=4237494 > An optician also selling delicatessen (or maybe a delicatessen store > also selling glasses). http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2217707756

Re: [Tagging] Emergency shelters

2017-09-07 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 07:41:37 +0200 Marc Gemis wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Nick Hocking > wrote: >> >> "I think amenity=shelter is well established " > > The social facility shelter > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:social_facility%3Dshelter > mentions emergency shelter. am

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sinkholes refinement

2017-09-11 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 07:54:09 + David Marchal wrote: > [..] > flow_direction=both, to model water streams connected to estavelles, > which is a karst feature acting as spring or ponor depending on the > current conditions, as these streams can have their flow reversed if > the estavelle starts

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-18 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 18:20:44 +0200 Selfish Seahorse wrote: > > > The current situation of how public outdoor and indoor swimming pool > [..] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre#Combinations "sport=swimming for a centre containing one or more swimming pools that is ma

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-18 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:46:24 +0200 Frederik Ramm wrote: > > On 18.09.2017 09:42, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: > > Whole facility: > > leisure=sports_center > > leisure=sports_centre (British English spelling) Thanks. And I don't even have an autocorrect to blame...

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-18 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 10:56:59 +0200 Selfish Seahorse wrote: > > On 18 September 2017 at 09:42, Jean-Marc Liotier > wrote: > > "sport=swimming for a centre containing one or more swimming pools > > that is mainly focussed on swimming as a sport, including swimming > &

Re: [Tagging] Swimming pool facilities

2017-09-27 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 18:38:15 +0200 Selfish Seahorse wrote: > (2) indoor swimming pools seem not to be tagged Because they do not appear on imagery, so fewer people are in a position to map them... But nothing keeps anyone from tagging them. ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Deprecating of leisure=common and leisure=village_green

2017-12-01 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 01:33:16 +0100 Daniel Koć wrote: > > land over which the public has general rights of use for certain > leisure activities That is exactly how I use leisure=common in Senegal: usually a block-sized area in town, which has no dedicated purpose but to provide some urban empty spa

<    1   2