On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:41 AM, "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" wrote:
> This discussion can be constructive, if and only if the participants
> understand at least the basic terms that are used in CR subdivision and
> address system. If you (or anyone else) is not clear on something, then
> ask a spec
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 03:27 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
>> Another problem which you don't seem to solve is the relationship of
>> imported and already existing data; it seems that in your particular case
>> you evaluated the situation by hand before
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> This one surprised me, was pretty sure that the US didn't have real
> mini roundabouts, but I just spotted one in Burien, WA.
> http://g.co/maps/afh8m
I've mapped dozens of these as miniroundabouts in the midwest:
http://g.co/maps/w7mnr
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Brian Quinion <
openstreet...@brian.quinion.co.uk> wrote:
> >> Discussing this for a day on the Tagging list is not enough for you to
> make
> >> this change.
> >
> > How much time should it take? I didn't really set a dead line but was
> > trying to get comments o
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Emilie Laffray
wrote:
>
> While I follow this mailing list, I am pretty sure that many people
> working in the OSM ecosystem is not following the change that fast. It means
> that every one doing an app needs to do some significant work to make sure
> that those
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:25 PM, John Smith wrote:
> On 31 July 2010 02:05, Emilie Laffray wrote:
> > While I follow this mailing list, I am pretty sure that many people
> working
> > in the OSM ecosystem is not following the change that fast. It means that
>
> What change, I have made a suggest
They should be part of a route relation.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> In the US there are two long federally-maintained roads, the Blue Ridge
> Parkway and Natchez Trace Parkway, that were built for the sole purpose of
> sightseeing. Since they are surrounded by a na
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 2/23/2011 9:46 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
>
>> They should be part of a route relation.
>>
>
> Buh...? I'm asking what highway=* value they should have.
Do they really, truly fit into one highway=* category al
