Re: [Tagging] business closed for renovation - tagging best practice

Hi Steve, Am Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2013, 13:25:44 schrieb Steve Doerr: > Would this fit the bill: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary ? Probably this would fit the bill even better: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours with http://wiki.openstreetmap.

[Tagging] Follow-up on Time Domains

Hi everybody, last year, I started an RFC to properly define time domains. Unfortunately, due to lack of time I wasn't able to follow-up on this. I would like to revive the discussion. The latest version of the proposal is here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Time_domains

Re: [Tagging] Follow-up on Time Domains

Hi Serge, Am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2013, 10:00:11 schrieb Serge Wroclawski: > The Microformats community seems to be going through a similar > process: http://microformats.org/wiki/opening-hours > > The funny part is that they use our current spec as an example of > opening hours done right. I fai

Re: [Tagging] Follow-up on Time Domains

Hi Richard, Am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2013, 09:46:37 schrieb Richard Welty: > "Generating results, this may take some time..." > > how long does this normally take? it downloads some data, then processes it using JavaScript. Here is a static version: http://eckhart-woerner.de/~eckhart/time/time-st

Re: [Tagging] Follow-up on Time Domains

Hi everybody, Am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2013, 15:16:14 schrieb Eckhart Wörner: > The latest version of the proposal is here: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Time_domains there have been some minor additions resulting in an updated spec. Here is the list of opening

Re: [Tagging] Follow-up on Time Domains

Hi Serge, Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2013, 06:51:29 schrieb Serge Wroclawski: > Except why use abbreviations that no one uses elsewhere? > > I've never seen two letter abbreviations for days of the week outside > OSM, in any computer system. > > So why use a codification that no one else uses, to s

Re: [Tagging] Mismatched Level of Detail in highways vs. other elements

Hi Martin, Am Sonntag, 7. April 2013, 13:35:23 schrieb Martin Atkins: > I wonder if the root problem is that we've conflated the idea of the > physical construct of a street with its parallel in the routing network. IMHO the underlying main problem is that OSM is steadily moving towards some ki

Re: [Tagging] Fast Food Restaurants

Am Donnerstag, 30. Mai 2013, 05:22:27 schrieb Tac Tacelosky: > postgres also has ILIKE, which does case-insensitive searches, so > that's working for the moment. Unfortunately, ILIKE will not use any indexing (unless your pattern starts with some characters that are not affected by capitalization

Re: [Tagging] Through_route next steps

Hi Rob, Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, 13:33:24 schrieb Rob Nickerson: > The next steps with any tag proposal that reaches a hung jury is to read > through the comments and update the proposal to address the issues raised. > > In this case I think the wiki page needs to be clearer about what this tag

Re: [Tagging] gross weight - conclusions & changes

Hi, Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013, 13:59:28 schrieb Colin Smale: > The UK Government seem to think an HGV starts at 3.5t GVW, not 7.5t. Which is not surprising since this exactly how the Vienna Convention defines it. > By those standards, hgv=no is not a correct transposition of the sign > with a lorr

Re: [Tagging] gross weight - conclusions & changes

Hi martinq, Am Dienstag, 2. Juli 2013, 20:01:59 schrieb martinq: > For highest level of confusion, "gross weight" is not used as (short) > synonym for *permissible* maximum mass everywhere. > > In contrary! In US they distinguish between: > GVW = gross vehicle weight, meaning the *ACTUAL* weight

<    1   2