[Tagging] RFC: new values for surface=*

2010-09-06 Thread Dmitry Granovsky
Hello, Here is the proposal originating from Russia: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Surface:all_weather. Basically, it involves splitting surface=unpaved into two more specific categories (more details on the proposal page). Your comments are welcome on the discussion page:

Re: [Tagging] RFC: new values for surface=*

2010-09-06 Thread Dmitry Granovsky
Thank you. 2010/9/6 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer : > 2010/9/6 Dmitry Granovsky : >> Hello, >> >> Here is the proposal originating from Russia: >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Surface:all_weather. >> >> Basically, it involves splitting surface=

[Tagging] Tagging several old_name's

2010-10-24 Thread Dmitry Granovsky
Hi all, There are lots of toponyms that change their names several times throughout their history. It seems that a single old_name tag is fairly insufficient if we just enumerate all the semicolon-separated values, and so is the old_nameN way since both don't state anything about the order of rena

Re: [Tagging] Tagging several old_name's

2010-10-25 Thread Dmitry Granovsky
name:- is not bad. However, we have to somehow combine it with name:LANG tags: name:en:1945-1954 or name:1945-1954:en. Have you ever seen it implemented? 2010/10/25 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer : > 2010/10/25 Dmitry Granovsky : > >> Does anyone have any ideas? (If I missed a previou