On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 15:10 +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Am 30.04.2011 um 12:10 schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
>
> > 2011/4/29 Stefan Bethke :
> >> It appears that people have been using "car" as a key for this purpose.
> >> Should I use that, and add an appropriate entry below motorcar=*?
> >
>
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 00:56 +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> > Maybe the alternative is to instead tag that its only suitable for
> > single-tracked vehicles (ie. access=no motorbike=yes) rather than trying
> > to figure out what isnt allowed? From how I read the discussion that
> > seems to be the
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:08 +0200, Sebastian Hohmann wrote:
> But don't forget bicycle=yes, foot=yes, horse=yes, skating=yes, dog=yes, ...
But is bicycle/horse/skate/dog parking allowed? This is a discussion of
how to tag limited access to parking, in which case you dont need to say
what IS allo
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 02:10 +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> hgv=no might or might not be understood to include busses, but it
> certainly would not imply cars with a trailer, or small caravans.
If I was towing a caravan, I wouldnt set my navigation device to think
Im in a car or a motorbike, Id mos
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 09:35 +0200, Karel Kuželka wrote:
> Hello,
> we are mapping cultural and entertainment objects in Prague and have
> trouble tagging MUSIC CLUBS, places to listen to LIVE music (e.g. jazz
> clubs, rock clubs etc)
>
>
> It seems an appropriate map feature is lacking.
> The cl
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 11:36 -0500, Brad Neuhauser wrote:
> I notice the suggested rendering is similar to schools. Don't know
> about other areas, but in the US, many childcare centers are run out
> of private homes, so that rendering might seem a little strange.
> Maybe in that case a node is a
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 00:02 -0700, Sam Vekemans wrote:
> The Wiki has
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dseafood
> "A shop selling fish/seafood."
> ...
> Alternative names during the discussion on the tagging mailinglist
> were:
>
> * shop=fish - To be easily confused with pet
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 18:10 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2011/5/16 David Murn :
> > I agree. I think seafood is a more generic proposal than 'fishmonger'
> > which may not be understood as widely.
>
> shop=fishmonger is the standard term every German-Engli
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 01:33 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2011/5/17 David Murn :
> > I think fishmonger is the shop/retailer, seafood is the product.
>
> would you use seafood for freshwater fish? And if yes, also if they
> sell only freshwater fish?
I think its just a
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 15:36 +0200, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How would you tag steps that provide access to water? See here:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/rhodes/5793021284
Im trying to map a similar situation, except in my case the bottom 2
steps are underwater at high-tide. This makes
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 15:58 +0200, fly wrote:
> I wonder why many people try to force the approval of a tag by fast
> votes on the wiki. A tag gets approved by uses in the data and software
> handling it.
Which raises another point, that if you really want to get your proposal
accepted more rapidl
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 22:15 +0100, ael wrote:
> Seriously, in the UK, "I am going to my club" would normally be
> understood to refer to some such institution, at least among some
> sections of the community.
In Australia, 'going to the club' means (generally) going to a licenced
members-only v
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 12:48 +0100, Dave F. wrote:
> On 14/06/2011 19:49, Peter Svensson wrote:
> > This tag might be useful for subjective tagging for bikes:
>
> Please avoid subjective tagging, because, err... it's subjective. For
> confusing examples refer to the page you linked to.
Out of int
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 20:51 -0500, John F. Eldredge wrote:
> I would not be surprised if there are also some occurrences of
> "drive-thru" or "drive_thru". American business people seem to prefer
> to write "thru" rather than "through", so much so that some members of
> the public probably are
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 18:53 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2011/2/14 Tom Chance :
> AFAIK there is quite a lot of differentiation in the vegetarian
> community (e.g. Ovo, lacto, ovo-lacto, veganism, raw veganism,
> fruitarianism, buddhist vegetarianism) if you are an expert in this
> field, m
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 13:24 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:02 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
> >(I know, don't tag for the renderers
>
> Can we just ban that ridiculous, misquoted and harmful commandment?
> Taking into account renderer support for current and proposed
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 01:52 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2011/2/16 Nathan Edgars II :
> >> -1,
> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Layer
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer
>
> our wiki is becoming something like the bible: you can find a page for
> every opinion ;-)
Thats
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 23:22 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
> Err, as I said, quibbles about aerodrome vs airport. Do we really want
> the ability to store aircraft to be the distinguishing feature between
> an airport and an aerodrome?
Its not so much about whether you can store aircraft, but that o
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 11:16 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2011/2/18 David Murn :
> > Because the use of (min_)levels,height is in use by 3D renderers and
>
>
> IMHO this min_level-part of the advanced building proposal is not
> working (is using wrong semanti
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 14:16 -0700, Paul Norman wrote:
> While looking into some issues around a bad import, I ran across
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenSeaMap/Lights_Data_Model but
> was unable to find a page with voting or discussion.
Not every tag has to be voted on. Some wiki pages e
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 19:56 +0100, Flaimo wrote:
> i would like to rewrite the wiki page for payment so there is a
> consistent payment:=yes/no scheme (like the fuel types
> for example). currently there is a mixture of boolean and list values
> which is not good for programmatic processing.
Im in
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 14:52 +0100, Flaimo wrote:
> ok, i see what you mean now. use amenity=parking for the whole
> facility, and the new tags for defining the elements inside.
In the case of the roads inside a parking area, there already exists
highway=service, service=parking_aisle.
http://wiki
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 14:42 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> >>
> >> This (new ?) schema seems not often used (some plant has the 2).
> >
> > Excellent example of wiki fiddling ...
>
>
> at least this was discussed and voted about:
Im sure I remember seeing this discussed either on here or po
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 10:33 +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> We've agreed in the spanish list to add the network tag to the ATM, so if
> there is no discussion against here, I will add that to the wiki.
The amenity=fuel tag schema uses:
payment:credit_cards=mastercard;visa;diners_club;ameri
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 20:12 +1100, David Murn wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 10:33 +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> > We've agreed in the spanish list to add the network tag to the ATM, so if
> > there is no discussion against here, I will add that to the wiki.
>
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 12:11 +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Am 02.04.2011 11:03, schrieb David Murn:
>
> > If someone comes up with a proposal, discusses it on mailing lists,
> > emails current users of the tag, casts and finishes a vote, how on earth
> > can you call it wiki
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 20:42 +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 20:12 +1100, David Murn wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 10:33 +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> > > > We've agreed in the spanish list to add the network tag to th
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 10:57 +0200, fly wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have found a power line with 3 quad-wired cables on one side and 3
> doubled-wired cables on the other.
>
> Should I use left/right for this ?
Since this is actually 2 lines simply following the same path, I suggest
using cables=6 wires=do
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 15:24 -0400, Richard Weait wrote:
> Also locally, a "gymnasium" is a large indoor sport floor which can be
> configured for multiple sports like gymnastics, basketball,
> volleyball, murderball, etc. taginfo says only 16 instances of
> leisure=gymnasium are in OSM at the mom
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 12:01 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2011/4/12 John Smith :
>
> >> My first idea was "tourist_bus=no"
> >
> > Why not use access:*=* ?
>
>
> Usually we tag foot=no instead of access:foot=no, and I don't see why
> I should change this standard here.
To be fair, using t
I mapped a road the other day which was exactly like this (different
speeds) and wondered exactly the same thing. The signs I saw applied to
trucks and buses though, more than just hgv/goods. As Tobias said, your
suggestion is suitable, Id add the suggestion of maxspeed:bus also.
David
On Sun,
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 13:27 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2011/4/25 David Murn :
> > The signs I saw applied to
> > trucks and buses though, more than just hgv/goods. As Tobias said, your
> > suggestion is suitable, Id add the suggestion of maxspeed:bus also.
> The
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 07:34 +0800, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
> According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brand
>
> "The brand=* is a larger entity that a place advertises itself as part of"
>
> Which means that you put "Burger King" or "Barclay's" or "McDonald's"
> into the brand t
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 19:33 +0100, Laurence Penney wrote:
> Historical event geotagging could rapidly get out of hand. This feels
> to me very much orthogonal to OSM - almost every news story, photo,
> work of art, etc arguably deserves a geotag, but hardly any of them
> deserve to be in OSM.
I ag
34 matches
Mail list logo
