[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Hierarchies route=bicycle)

2018-12-30 Thread Axelos
Hello, I propose a concept for contributing cycling route. my english is bad, sorry ... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Hierarchies_route%3Dbicycle "Definition" Bike routes are represented on OpenStreetMap as relations. There are many official routes that are already prese

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Hierarchies route=bicycle)

2018-12-31 Thread Axelos
Hello, Paul Allen wrote > On Sun, 30 Dec 2018 at 18:20, Axelos < > axelos@ > > wrote: > [...] > >> >> The concept of hierarchical relations makes it possible to avoid this >> edition nightmare, so that one single relation has to be modified, and &

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Hierarchies route=bicycle)

2018-12-31 Thread Axelos
Hello, Peter Elderson wrote > Look at Nederland on waymarkedtrails, hiking tab and bicycle tab, to see > this is already working. In the information text they explain how they > handle the hierarchy. I know and I am inspired by it. But is it wise to rely on basic documentation located on a third

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Hierarchies route=bicycle)

2018-12-31 Thread Axelos
Hello, Peter Elderson wrote > I think you describe a use case for that. This can be added to existing > "How-to" pages for building routes. These vary somewhat by country, > according to what rules the national community has agreed upon. This is the idea. The problem is to use third-party docum

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Hierarchies route=bicycle)

2018-12-31 Thread Axelos
-- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f5258744.html ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Hierarchies route=bicycle)

2018-12-31 Thread Axelos
Hello, Paul Allen wrote > On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 08:41, Axelos < > axelos@ > > wrote: > >> >> This is not the same usage, but uses that complement each other. >> >> Super-route: Linking international routes >> Route hierarchy: exploit other ro

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Hierarchies route=bicycle)

2019-01-14 Thread Axelos
Hello, voschix wrote > 1) The problem exists in the same way also for other routes like: > route=road|foot|hiking|bus|trolleybus|tram|mtb| > So the wording has to be reviewed under this aspect Exactly, I have already made the same reflection on bus routes that take the same path over long distan

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Hierarchies route=bicycle)

2019-01-14 Thread Axelos
Hello, Richard Fairhurst wrote > Axelos wrote: >> Hello, I propose a concept for contributing cycling route. > > From the description on the wiki page, I'm not sure how your proposal > differs from the practice documented at > https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Hierarchies route=bicycle)

2019-01-20 Thread Axelos
Hello Paul, Paul Allen wrote > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 10:38, Axelos < > axelos@ > > wrote: > > The direction signs are a real problem. An alternative solution is to >> exploit the destination key >> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org//search?q=destination%3

[Tagging] Propose the tag shop=military_surplus

2013-12-05 Thread Axelos
Hello, I proposed the tag shop=military_surplus for the shops selling used military equipment. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Military_surplus my english is limited ... cordially. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists

Re: [Tagging] Propose the tag shop=military_surplus

2013-12-06 Thread Axelos
Hello Le 05/12/2013 12:16, SomeoneElse a écrit : Axelos wrote: I proposed the tag shop=military_surplus for the shops selling used military equipment. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Military_surplus If you think that it makes sense to tag a particular shop that way just go ahead and

Re: [Tagging] Propose the tag shop=military_surplus

2013-12-07 Thread Axelos
Hello, Le 06/12/2013 14:25, Dan S a écrit : Yes, but proposing/voting is not really important for simple cases like this - you want to tag shop=military_surplus, you should go ahead - there's no need to make big formalities of it, people use all sorts of shop=* tags. If you want to make a wiki p