Re: [Tagging] reviving an abandoned proposal

2016-07-23 Thread Alejandro S.
Hi, IMHO they are the same feature but made by different methods (handmade or erosion), maybe we can use cutting=handmade and cutting=hollow_way respectively? And let cutting=yes as the general tag. Regards, Alejandro On Sat, Jul 23, 2016, 03:50 Kevin Kenny wrote: > The mountains around here ha

Re: [Tagging] Tagging for palapa

2016-07-24 Thread Alejandro S.
Loos like building=roof + new tag for refinement? Atentamente, Alejandro Suárez On 24 July 2016 at 22:22, Tod Fitch wrote: > There are some structures on a beach I’d like to tag which I believe are > called a palapa [1]. Not my photos, but there are images of others on the > web, for instance

Re: [Tagging] cave_entrance. ref and name

2016-08-30 Thread Alejandro S.
In Spain there isn't any cave cadastre. Each speleology club give a name and/or ref to the caves they found in their explaration area. Each club has its own system to name the new caves. So it could be need to specify also the club in the ref? It will be cave:ref:es:CEA=A-111 for a cave explored by

[Tagging] Hunting area tagging

2016-10-17 Thread Alejandro S.
Hi everybody! Is there a tag for hunting areas? I mean, big areas, sometimes fenced and usually you have to pay to hunt there. Kind regards, Alejandro Suárez ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/t

[Tagging] Mediterranean "bar" aka pub

2016-12-06 Thread Alejandro S.
Hi! I'm from Spain and I found surprising the fact that in the wiki there are an exception in the bar tag[0] about the Mediterranean ones: In Mediterranean countries, the word "bar" has a different meaning > (although this doesn't necessarily mean the tag should be applied > differently). Here a

Re: [Tagging] Mediterranean "bar" aka pub

2016-12-07 Thread Alejandro S.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016, 10:07 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > On 7 Dec 2016, at 02:32, Alejandro S. wrote: > > That looks like the definition of a Spanish "*bar*", why not use the tag > that describe that concept, amenity=pub. > > &g

Re: [Tagging] Mediterranean "bar" aka pub

2016-12-07 Thread Alejandro S.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016, 11:27 Volker Schmidt wrote: > The situation in Italy is similar. > In my area (Veneto) they are mostly tagged as amenity=cafe, I suppose that > is because this is the most frequently served item. > Maybe amenity=cafe it's wrong, but would you tag those establishments (that a

Re: [Tagging] Mediterranean "bar" aka pub

2016-12-07 Thread Alejandro S.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016, 21:02 ksg wrote: > > Am 07.12.2016 um 11:26 schrieb Volker Schmidt : > > The situation in Italy is similar. > > In my area (Veneto) they are mostly tagged as amenity=cafe, I suppose > that is because this is the most frequently served item. > > > I guess caffe (espresso) is a

Re: [Tagging] Mediterranean "bar" aka pub

2016-12-07 Thread Alejandro S.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016, 21:36 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 7 Dec 2016, at 21:00, ksg wrote: > > > > I guess caffe (espresso) is also the most _important_ served item and > justifies amenity=cafe for an Italian „bar" > > > for me, amenity=cafe implies tables and chairs

Re: [Tagging] Mediterranean "bar" aka pub

2016-12-07 Thread Alejandro S.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016, 23:41 Volker Schmidt wrote: > The correct tagging would certainly be "amenity" with several values, > separated by semicolons. > That's allowed by the osm data structure. We (try to) avoid it because of > the inherent problems with the subsequent rendering. > Maybe we could