Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified, conflicting definitions

2022-10-02 Thread Greg Troxel
"Shawn K. Quinn" writes: > Related to this, I've been tagging the driveways inside apartment > complexes as service, but a lot of mappers tag them as > residential. These roads are more similar to shopping mall driveways > than the type of road I would normally tag as residential; also note > th

Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified, conflicting definitions

2022-10-02 Thread Greg Troxel
Kevin Broderick writes: > Another exception in New England, particularly, is that some states > (especially New Hampshire and Vermont) have a non-trivial number of > driveways that are privately maintained but in whole or part legally public > right of ways. In some cases, three public right of

Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified, conflicting definitions

2022-10-02 Thread Greg Troxel
stevea writes: > Ah, I thought of an exception: a service=alley is (usually, around > here, in California) a public way, but it IS more "service-" oriented, > like maybe it only gets used for rare, backyard-access by owners > (which would be exclusively private use), but maybe it DOES get used >

Re: [Tagging] service vs. unclassified, conflicting definitions

2022-10-02 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
1 paź 2022, 18:30 od f...@zz.de: > For me the difference is > > service -> Private property > unclassified -> Public road > That is not viable as general rule. For example Poland has driveway leadingto abandoned railway station classifiedas a public road. Tagging it as highway=unclassified

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Healthcare 1.1

2022-10-02 Thread Robin Burek
Hey, I started a proposal to clean up the healthcare sector. I am looking forward to lively discussions and would like to point out the two options A and B under "proposal". I am open to both sides and would be happy to hear constructive arguments pro and con. So that we can make tagging here a lit

[Tagging] Terminology primary feature, main tag, etc..

2022-10-02 Thread martianfreeloader
Hi, I'm unsure if I'm using correct terminology. I have come across these terms in the OSM ecosystem: - primary feature [1] - main key [2] - primary key [3] - feature tag [4] 1) Are these synonyms (except for the key/tag distinction)? 2) Is *one* of these terms "official" OSM speek with a cl

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Bench: replace seats by capacity

2022-10-02 Thread Raphael
Until very recently, the wiki said that seats=* means seats, not capacity: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:amenity%3Dbench&diff=2357111&oldid=2347958 In my opinion, this should be reverted. Besides, i'm not very enthusiastic about using capacity=* because this is quite subje

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Bench: replace seats by capacity

2022-10-02 Thread Peter Elderson
I agree that the old text for seats=* is much better. I would add capacity=* with the new text: Number of people who can comfortably sit on the bench at one time. I think it's not a problem that mappers may estimate differently, most will agree most of the time, and if the previous mapper e.g.

Re: [Tagging] Terminology primary feature, main tag, etc..

2022-10-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 2 Oct 2022, at 19:40, martianfreeloader > wrote: > > - primary feature [1] > - main key [2] > - primary key [3] > - feature tag [4] > > 1) Are these synonyms (except for the key/tag distinction)? yes > > 2) Is *one* of these terms "official" OSM speek with a clea

Re: [Tagging] Terminology primary feature, main tag, etc..

2022-10-02 Thread Illia Marchenko
1) Yes, it is. 2) I don't know. Regards, Illia. вс, 2 окт. 2022 г., 20:40 martianfreeloader : > Hi, > > I'm unsure if I'm using correct terminology. I have come across these > terms in the OSM ecosystem: > > - primary feature [1] > - main key [2] > - primary key [3] > - feature tag [4] > > 1) Ar

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - migration to use belarusian as default language in Belarus for tagging

2022-10-02 Thread Paveł Tyślacki
Hi Want to leave reminder for active Belarus mappers who still want to take part in voting. Voting started for migration to use belarusian as default language in Belarus for tagging and will finish next week. There are link to proposal and voiting (belarusian) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki

Re: [Tagging] Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - Bench: replace seats by capacity

2022-10-02 Thread Anne- Karoline Distel
I agree that an objective value like the actual width would be better. (And I've finally seen what I believe to be 2-seat benches for the first time in my life over the weekend.)Anne--Sent from my Android phone with WEB.DE Mail. Please excuse my brevity.On 02/10/2022, 23:07 Raphael wrote:

Re: [Tagging] Terminology primary feature, main tag, etc..

2022-10-02 Thread Minh Nguyen
Vào lúc 10:36 2022-10-02, martianfreeloader đã viết: Hi, I'm unsure if I'm using correct terminology. I have come across these terms in the OSM ecosystem: - primary feature [1] - main key [2] - primary key [3] - feature tag [4] 1) Are these synonyms (except for the key/tag distinction)? 2)

Re: [Tagging] Terminology primary feature, main tag, etc..

2022-10-02 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Oct 2, 2022, 23:30 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > sent from a phone > >> On 2 Oct 2022, at 19:40, martianfreeloader >> wrote: >> >> - primary feature [1] >> - main key [2] >> - primary key [3] >> - feature tag [4] >> >> 1) Are these synonyms (except for the key/tag distinction)? >> > > > ye

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Healthcare 1.1

2022-10-02 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
I used to consider deprecating of amenity=hospital as clearly bad idea, even if done in far future But healthcare tag seems to be a good idea to me and I even ended using it in one of tags that I promoted/proposed/invented. But note that over half of amenity=hospital is without healthcare=hospita