It has been raised on a private discussion if we could mention whether
a private house or an industrial site has a guard dog that is easily
identifiable by its barking. It is my viewpoint that from a mapping
ethics standpoint, we should not map this because it may compromise a
home's security. What
On 10/14/20 09:19, bkil wrote:
> It has been raised on a private discussion if we could mention whether
> a private house or an industrial site has a guard dog that is easily
> identifiable by its barking. It is my viewpoint that from a mapping
> ethics standpoint, we should not map this because it
sent from a phone
> On 14. Oct 2020, at 16:22, bkil wrote:
>
> It has been raised on a private discussion if we could mention whether
> a private house or an industrial site has a guard dog that is easily
> identifiable by its barking.
if you only hear it this could still be a fake barking
Please send messages to forum, John.
On 14/10/2020 03:17, John D. wrote:
unless you visit the platform or there is a visible sign how do you
know where the train stops ?
Unsure of the relevance of that to this discussion.
how is nodes better than area ?
Points have already been made.
Dav
A person navigating with a cane can use multiple cues on any given
section, and "hearing a dog" could be one of them. If two houses are
marked at 33% and 66% of a block as having dogs and only one of them
barks at you at a given occasion, you should still be able to
integrate this cue among others
Hi Tagging List,
Here is the RFC for the proposal for rideshare vehicle access:
Proposal:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Rideshare_Access
Discussion:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Proposed_features/Rideshare_Access
This proposes the addition of ri
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 01:10, bkil wrote:
> "hearing a dog" could be one of them.
But aren't you then going to need to differentiate the sounds?
# 18 has a Chihuahua (yap yap yap yap yap yap yap yap) while # 23 has a
Rottweiler (WOOF)
Thanks
Graeme
___
Clare,
The "proposal" section currently fails to include the actual proposal: that
is, what new key and tags are you proposing to use?
It looks like the proposal is: "approve the use of the new key "rideshare="
with values "yes" and "no" to specify legal access for rideshare vehicles."
But you w
Hi,
I'm proposing that we change the man_made tag to human_made.
I feel it is a discussion that we need to have as there seems to be little
discussion to date.
This is my first proposal so forgive me if i've missed something out on the
proposal page.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 01:57, Robert Delmenico wrote:
>
> I also understand that generally speaking the use of man_made is
> commonly accepted as a gender neutral term, but in reality it has been
> adapted that way due to past practices of gender bias.
>
You are correct that there was a change o
10 matches
Mail list logo
