Re: [Tagging] Confusion bicycle_road <> cyclestreet

On 26-08-2020 14:42, Volker Schmidt wrote: > What is the "saving" n using the cyclestreet=yes tagging? […] > Basically I see no need for separate tags like bicycle_road and > cyclestreet, as you can easily describe their properties with > existing tags. Add to this the confusion between the two

Re: [Tagging] Tagging multiple images on one object

"by policy they _should_ delete the lower quality image if a better quality image is also available"only when it is an exact duplicate - not just photo of the same object Aug 26, 2020, 21:45 by bkil.hu...@gmail.com: > Didn't we have an OSM tool in the past that showed points with broken links?

Re: [Tagging] Tagging multiple images on one object

Then there's OpenTrailView as a viable alternative (neither Mapillary, nor OpenStreetCam has a free server component), although in the long term, I think we should follow an IPFS, P2P or federated-systems route to scale costs. I don't feel it's fair to overload Commons by shifting the costs of all

Re: [Tagging] Tagging multiple images on one object

I would ask on Commons whatever it would be acceptable, I would not just assume that this is unwanted. Aug 27, 2020, 12:18 by bkil.hu...@gmail.com: > Then there's OpenTrailView as a viable alternative (neither Mapillary, nor > OpenStreetCam has a free server component), although in the long ter

Re: [Tagging] Tagging multiple images on one object

I would assume that this is unwanted based on my above citations from their scope document. Was this not your reading on this question? Although, if we ask, they _may_ decide to change their scope based on our needs, but as estimated, this would greatly increase their expenses. On Thu, Aug 27, 202

Re: [Tagging] Tagging multiple images on one object

Can you elaborate on how IPFS would work? From my understanding, if I add a file (in this case an image) to my node then a unique address is generated. But the file is only permanently stored on my node unless someone else manually pins it on theirs? Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone > On 27 Aug

Re: [Tagging] Tagging multiple images on one object

This video explains it well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Uj6uR3fp-U Basically IPFS is a protocol, just like how http is protocol. IPFS is meant to create a torrent like network of data. Every piece of data is linked to a hash which identifies that piece of data. Anybody can help host data on

Re: [Tagging] Tagging multiple images on one object

On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 11:20, bkil wrote: > > I don't feel it's fair to overload Commons by shifting the costs of all of > our street level imagery to them. > It would be unfair to Commons by treating them as an alternative to Mapillary or OpenStreetCam. Also pretty much against their policy, a

[Tagging] tagging for fairgrounds

i've had a little discussion of this over on the slack tagging channel. i'm currently working on some historic World's Fair/Exhibition sites, and also have reviewed a number of fair grounds in the US. we really don't have any tagging specific to these sorts of structured park-like areas that have

Re: [Tagging] tagging for fairgrounds

On 27/08/2020 17:04, Richard Welty wrote: so i'd like to propose one of these two "fairgrounds" is more of an American rather than a British English way of referring to these sorts of things, I think.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-February/thread.html#24188 for

Re: [Tagging] tagging for fairgrounds

On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 17:19, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 27/08/2020 17:04, Richard Welty wrote: > > "fairgrounds" is more of an American rather than a British English way > of referring to these sorts of things, I think. As is fair. Without further qualification, I'd interpret "fair" as a (temp

Re: [Tagging] tagging for fairgrounds

On 8/27/20 12:35 PM, Paul Allen wrote: > > As is fair.  Without further qualification, I'd interpret "fair" as a > (temporary, mobile) funfair: an annual event with fairground rides, > stalls, etc. I think American usage may tend more towards trade fairs. > > As for mapping the temporary funfair t

Re: [Tagging] Benches and hostile architecture

Ok, I will use that with the tag for the physical obstructions. Thanks all for the discussion August 24, 2020 7:07:08 PM CEST Joseph Eisenberg wrote: RE: "Would something like hindrance:target = lying_down or hindrance:target = sitting be more clear?" While this is somewhat less ambiguous, it

Re: [Tagging] tagging for fairgrounds

On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 15:29 -0400, Richard Welty wrote: > On 8/27/20 12:35 PM, Paul Allen wrote: > > As is fair. Without further qualification, I'd interpret "fair" as > > a > > (temporary, mobile) funfair: an annual event with fairground rides, > > stalls, etc. I think American usage may tend mor

Re: [Tagging] tagging for fairgrounds

On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 05:31, Richard Welty wrote: > > again in the US, state and county fairgrounds are permanent facilities > which function as event space when the fair is not actually going on. > the midway is usually temporary, but the buildings for, say, > agricultural exhibits are permanen

Re: [Tagging] tagging for fairgrounds

On 28/8/20 8:05 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 05:31, Richard Welty > wrote: again in the US, state and county fairgrounds are permanent facilities which function as event space when the fair is not actually going on. the midw