OK, now you've all got me confused!
I always thought that access=yes means that it is open to the general
public, while access=no means that it's not open to the public?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.ope
Muralito,
it would be very useful if you could address the request i have made
several times now. I will not engage in a discussion on the other
lines you mean to open here because it is non-productive from my
perspective. It could take us hours to determine the smallest common
denominator
Aug 6, 2020, 09:12 by graemefi...@gmail.com:
> OK, now you've all got me confused!
>
> I always thought that access=yes means that it is open to the general public,
> while access=no means that it's not open to the public?
>
Yes, and it may be overriden by more specific tags.
Note that access
On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 13:58 -0700, Tod Fitch wrote:
> My reading of the wiki [1] indicates that the more specific tag
> overrides the less specific tag. And the transport mode section [2]
> of that has examples very much like those in your question.
> And:
> access=yes
> bicycle=no
>
> Means you c
Please see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/more_parking.
To summarize: I am proposing the following:
- To codify / make official the de-facto parking_space=disabled
- To allow mapping motorcycle parking as part of a unified parking lot,
by introducing parking_space=motorc
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Customer_service
again
Main difference is witching to customer_service=yes/no
from amenity=customer_service
Thanks for all feedback and thanks for edits and comments.
Rationale:
Distinguishing closed office spaces and offices with client ser
sent from a phone
> On 6. Aug 2020, at 23:18, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> Using access tags access=yes/access=customers/access=private - it is
> not entirely clear. And in many cases place clearly offers customer
> service but nearly all office is still closed to outsiders. Sti
sent from a phone
> On 6. Aug 2020, at 22:54, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>
> - To codify / make official the de-facto parking_space=disabled
that’s almost 22k uses, it is already established and voting yes or no will not
change it
> - To allow mapping motorcycle parking as part of a unified p
I've so far stayed out of this discussion because my final thoughts on
the matter will I am sure be contentious.
In no order of importance my thoughts are:
1) the idea of basing a the limit on coastline on levels of salinity or
average water flows makes as little sense as trying to specify tha
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 17:12:48 +1000
Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>OK, now you've all got me confused!
>
>I always thought that access=yes means that it is open to the general
>public, while access=no means that it's not open to the public?
The issue is that it becomes the default for all other trans
10 matches
Mail list logo
