Hi,
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/temp#values
any guesses as to what this might mean?
I stumbled across it when reverting some vandalism on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/784166844 but that street has been
split so many times by people adding turn restrictions that the "person
creati
I'm just guessing, and I try with a sort of placeholder for saying that
some tag is "temporary"... even if this sounds not really useful :-)
Ale
On 05/08/20 10:41, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/temp#values
any guesses as to what this might mean?
I stumbled
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 01:34, wrote:
>
>
> - Mensaje original -
> > De: "Joseph Eisenberg"
> > Para: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <
> tagging@openstreetmap.org>
> > Enviados: Martes, 4 de Agosto 2020 16:56:31
> > Asunto: Re: [Tagging] Rio de la Plata edit war
>
> > The gra
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 04:41, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/temp#values
>
> any guesses as to what this might mean?
>
> I stumbled across it when reverting some vandalism on
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/784166844 but that street has been
> split so many times
Hello,
If:
access=no
foot=yes
Does this mean that all access except foot travel is prohibited, or is it
an error?
If:
access=yes
bicycle=no
Does this mean that all access except bicycle travel is allowed, or is an
error?
Here is one example of the first case:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 3:45 PM Mike Thompson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If:
> access=no
> foot=yes
>
> Does this mean that all access except foot travel is prohibited, or is it
> an error?
>
Correct, only pedestrians are allowed.
> If:
> access=yes
> bicycle=no
>
> Does this mean that all access exce
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 2:59 PM Tod Fitch wrote:
> My reading of the wiki [1] indicates that the more specific tag overrides
> the less specific tag.
>
So,
access=yes
foot=yes
would then be redundant. I don't have an example, but I have seen that too.
> And the transport mode section [2] of t
Aug 5, 2020, 22:44 by miketh...@gmail.com:
> Hello,
>
> If:
> access=no
> foot=yes
>
> Does this mean that all access except foot travel is prohibited
>
yes
> , or is it an error?
>
No, it is a correct tagging - though usually there is a better way to achieve
this
(highway=footway
Aug 5, 2020, 22:58 by t...@fitchfamily.org:
> so I guess my reading of the wiki doesn’t match all data consumers
> implementations.
>
Yes, in many cases support is limited. Routers are usually dealing it with
fairly well,
but for example iD editor is missing support for example for vehicle tag,
Am Mi., 5. Aug. 2020 um 23:21 Uhr schrieb Mike Thompson :
>
> However, access=yes is a pretty broad statement. There may be modes of
> transport not yet contemplated (or which the mapper, and even the land
> manager is not aware of) which in the future will be prohibited.
>
+1, "access=*" is a
Here's another issue I would like mural...@montevideo.com.uy to address:
In Venezuela the second largest city is on a body of water called "Lago de
Maracaibo":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11334852
As mentioned in Wikipedia, local Venezolanos often refer to this as a lake
(lago), not a
- Mensaje original -
> De: "Joseph Eisenberg"
> Para: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> Enviados: Miércoles, 5 de Agosto 2020 19:46:06
> Asunto: Re: [Tagging] Rio de la Plata edit war
> Here's another issue I would like mural...@montevideo.com.uy to address:
> In Venezuela
My reading of the wiki [1] indicates that the more specific tag overrides the
less specific tag. And the transport mode section [2] of that has examples very
much like those in your question.
So:
access=no
foot=yes
Means that all access other than foot is prohibited.
And:
access=yes
bicycle=no
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 17:20, Mike Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 2:59 PM Tod Fitch wrote:
>> My reading of the wiki [1] indicates that the more specific tag overrides
>> the less specific tag.
>
> So,
> access=yes
> foot=yes
>
> would then be redundant. I don't have an example, but I
14 matches
Mail list logo
