Am Do., 23. Juli 2020 um 15:53 Uhr schrieb Volker Schmidt :
> Careful with "access".
> access=customers on an office building would imply you can drive into this
> building with any means of transport, provided you are a customer.
>
no, this does not seem to make sense. When there is a highway=f
Dear all,
I eventually found on-the-ground images of the feature I would like to propose
/ map. As you can see these areas are not sand (different granulometry), nor
scree (very particular definition in natural=scree wikipage). They are not part
of road, but are passable by cars. They are not b
sent from a phone
> On 27. Jul 2020, at 13:41, Michael Montani wrote:
>
> I eventually found on-the-ground images of the feature I would like to
> propose / map.
are these suggested to be represented as polygons? How would the border be
determined? I looks from the imagery as if there is a
My entire county is contained within a national forest, and most of the
roads through residential areas are a single lane dirt road maintained
(sort-of) by the homeowners themselves. Often at the last house the road
becomes an unmaintained jeep trail, usually gated, and goes a really
long way into
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 8:37 AM Rob Savoye wrote:
> The question is how to tag the change in the road. Usually it becomes
> "smoothness=very_bad", etc... The question is since it's now more of a
> track used by jeeps, should it be narrow=yes, still lanes=1, or should I
> use width=2m ? To me, l
On 25/07/2020 16.40, Allroads wrote:
The earlier mentioned,
bicycle=leave
This is for me, leave the bicycle behind at the sign.
More native English speakers can give a comment on that?
I don't know that I would guess that's what that means...
(Strictly from a "what's most reasonable, ignoring
Date: Jul 27, 2020, 15:54
From: ba...@ursamundi.org
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] narrow=yes, vs lanes=1, vs width
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 8:37 AM Rob Savoye <> r...@senecass.com> > wrote:
>
>> The question is how to tag the change in the road. Usually it becomes
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:18 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Date: Jul 27, 2020, 15:54
> From: ba...@ursamundi.org
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] narrow=yes, vs lanes=1, vs width
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 8:37 AM Rob Sav
On 7/27/20 9:18 AM, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
> highway=track appears to be incorrect here (but may be still correct if
> it is leading to only vacation huts)
It's a residential "track" to the vacation houses, often usually only
used in the summer or for ski trips. After the last bui
I'd go with highway=track and tracktype=*, surface=* and smoothness=* tags
as necessary. Given how inconsistent the 3 and especially 4 digit US
forest service roads tend to be, I'd expect tracktype and smoothness are
underutilized despite their relative importance on those roads.
A big hint: The
On 7/27/20 10:10 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> 3 and 4 digit forest service roads? They're there exclusively there for
> the benefit of forestry (namely logging, replanting and fire
> suppression). If they happen to help someone else get where they're
> going, great, but that's not what they're buil
On 7/27/20 11:00 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I'd go with highway=track and tracktype=*, surface=* and smoothness=*
> tags as necessary. Given how inconsistent the 3 and especially 4 digit
> US forest service roads tend to be, I'd expect tracktype and smoothness
> are underutilized despite their rela
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:21 PM Rob Savoye wrote:
> Personally though, what the USFS uses to determine that difference
> doesn't seem consistent, and over many years, the road conditions change
> drastically due to erosion. I prefer to go there in a high-clearance
> vehicle or UTV and decide a
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 07:36:00 -0600
Rob Savoye wrote:
> My entire county is contained within a national forest, and most of
> the roads through residential areas are a single lane dirt road
> maintained (sort-of) by the homeowners themselves. Often at the last
> house the road becomes an unmainta
sent from a phone
> On 27. Jul 2020, at 17:20, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> highway=track appears to be incorrect here (but may be still correct if it is
> leading to
> only vacation huts)
these would be highway=service not track.
Cheers Martin
___
On 7/27/20 1:04 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> highway=track appears to be incorrect here (but maybe still correct
>> if it is leading to only vacation huts)
>> these would be highway=service not track.
I assume if the highway has no name, it'd be highway=service, but if
it has a county name,
sent from a phone
> On 27. Jul 2020, at 21:56, Rob Savoye wrote:
>
> I assume if the highway has no name, it'd be highway=service, but if
> it has a county name, like "Lost Gulch Road" too, wouldn't it then be
> highway=residential?
that’s how I would see it as well
Cheers Martin
Jul 27, 2020, 21:55 by r...@senecass.com:
> On 7/27/20 1:04 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>>> highway=track appears to be incorrect here (but maybe still correct
>>> if it is leading to only vacation huts)
>>> these would be highway=service not track.
>>>
>
> I assume if the highway has no n
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 2:56 PM Rob Savoye wrote:
> On 7/27/20 1:04 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> >> highway=track appears to be incorrect here (but maybe still correct
> >> if it is leading to only vacation huts)
> >> these would be highway=service not track.
>
> I assume if the highway has
On 7/27/20 11:19 AM, Rob Savoye wrote:
On 7/27/20 11:00 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
I'd go with highway=track and tracktype=*, surface=* and smoothness=*
tags as necessary. Given how inconsistent the 3 and especially 4 digit
US forest service roads tend to be, I'd expect tracktype and smoothness
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 5:07 PM Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 2:56 PM Rob Savoye wrote:
>
>> On 7/27/20 1:04 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> >> highway=track appears to be incorrect here (but maybe still correct
>> >> if it is leading to only vacation huts)
>> >> these woul
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 5:38 PM brad wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm in central Colorado, & around here, I agree, tracktype is not
> useful, the tracks here are mostly solid, grade 2 or 3, but could be a
> high clearance, or 4wd road due to rocks and ledges.
> However, smoothness could, and should be rendered
On 27/07/2020 17.59, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
Jul 27, 2020, 21:55 by r...@senecass.com:
I assume if the highway has no name, it'd be highway=service, but if
it has a county name, like "Lost Gulch Road" too, wouldn't it then be
highway=residential? Is there a difference if it's vacati
28 Jul 2020, 06:47 by mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com:
> On 27/07/2020 17.59, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>
>> Jul 27, 2020, 21:55 by r...@senecass.com:
>>
>>> I assume if the highway has no name, it'd be highway=service, but if
>>> it has a county name, like "Lost Gulch Road" too, wouldn't i
24 matches
Mail list logo
