On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 17:50, Garry Keenor wrote:
> Paul - thanks for the response. I struggle with the idea that someone
> would know that a route is electrified with a ground level contact system,
> but not how many rails there are. The possible sources are a) local
> knowledge,
>
Or local-ish
Martin Koppenhoefer:
==
Warin, can you give an example for something historic that is not
there any more in reality and should be removed from OpenStreetMap?
Through all the years I have never encountered anything like this
mapped in OpenStreetMap.
==
I have deleted some powerlines tagged
as remo
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 14:02, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote:
>
> I have deleted some powerlines tagged
> as removed.
>
Are they still visible in any of the aerial imagery available to mappers?
If
so, deleting those power lines tagged as removed may lead to their
resurrection.
--
Paul
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:09:10 +0100
Paul Allen wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 14:02, Niels Elgaard Larsen
>wrote:
>
>>
>> I have deleted some powerlines tagged
>> as removed.
>>
>
>Are they still visible in any of the aerial imagery available to
>mappers? If
>so, deleting those power lines tagg
Martin Koppenhoefer:
==
there aren't only written/drawn sources by the way. Oral tradition can
also be relevant. Your grandpa told your dad and your dad told you, why
not?
==
That is what the history is for.
Also it does not scale to more than one change.
The road where I live have been changed
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 14:59, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote:
>
> Some stores are tagges as vacant or disused.
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3405891059
>
> Which makes some sense if there still is a physical separate store.
> And it could be useful, e.g. for someone wanting to lease it.
> But
The table with value in the bicycle_parking wiki has been updated with
this new value handlebar_holder.
The photo has been uploaded to WikiMedia Commons (CC0).
Kind regards,/
Hidde Wieringa/
/
/
On 13-06-2020 23:22, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
Can you take your own photo of such bicy
Regarding power lines: it is helpful mapping razed power lines as razed and
not removing them completely, because in many cases some of the satellite
pictures still show the towers, or at least the concrete foundations. This
way you avd resurrection.
The same argument applies to other objects as we
Currently socket:type1 and socket:type2 are not clarifying if the
station has a cable or we must bring our own.
Since the connector is not necessarily a socket, it is being discussed
on our telegram group https://t.me/openchargemap to change all sockets
into connector. Only add socket or cable wher
Thank you!
Jun 14, 2020, 17:01 by hi...@hiddewieringa.nl:
>
> The table with value in the bicycle_parking wiki has been updated with
> this new value handlebar_holder.
>
>
> The photo has been uploaded to WikiMedia Commons (CC0).
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Hidde Wieringa
>
>
>
> On 13-06-2020
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 15:20:56 +0100
Paul Allen wrote:
>
>That is where the was: lifecycle prefix and notes are useful: to
>prevent armchair mappers resurrecting something from imagery on the
>internet.
Yes. And I would not delete, e.g., power lines that are visible
on aerials.
Also because I wou
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:47 PM Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote:
> Yes. And I would not delete, e.g., power lines that are visible
> on aerials.
> Also because I would not be sure that were really removed and not just
> unused.
I'd add a lifecycle prefix to make sure that someone else looking at
the
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 13:12:49 -0400
Kevin Kenny wrote:
>What do you mean by 'just unused?'
Waiting to be demolished.
>If I'm in the field, looking at the alleged powerline, and finding
>nothing, why would I not simply make them go away (with a lifecycle
>prefix to protect against someone else
Jun 14, 2020, 18:46 by elga...@agol.dk:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 15:20:56 +0100
> Paul Allen wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
> >That is where the was: lifecycle prefix and notes are useful: to
> >prevent armchair mappers resurrecting something from imagery on the
> >internet.
>
> Yes. And I would not delete, e.
Thank you Hidde!
I've added a german translation of your text at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:DE:Bicycle_parking
I did a small crosscheck: At
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/L0mLQtnwvDlEfB0tHlzeAQ I've found a picture of
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697927260 that was tag
I think it is fairly unlikely that any more 4th rail will be built, and
certainly not converted. It is a system which makes it difficult to detect
earth faults, as well as making the design of junctions more complex. Not
impossible though.
best regards,
Garry
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 12:22, Paul
Just to let you all know that I have changed the proposal to incorporate
the feedback to leave electrified=rail in place for 3rd rail.
best regards,
Garry
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/taggin
Jun 14, 2020, 20:51 by lukas.toggenbur...@fhgr.ch:
> Do we need additional steps to make this value "official"?
>
You can go through a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process
but it is unlikely to add anything.
You can try asking for support in editors (JOSM presets etc), but not
I created
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:fcode
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:ftype
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:reach_code
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:com_id
about tags added in imports.
Review is welcomed, especially the first two where
Is it not possible to get people who were involved in the original import
to check these.things?
I would be wary to remove such things remotely and without knowing what
information these codes carry ore once carried,
I had a look at our imported waterways in Italy (which have mainly two
problems:
Jun 14, 2020, 22:55 by vosc...@gmail.com:
> Is it not possible to get people who were involved in the original import to
> check these.things?
>
Good idea, any idea how to identify accounts that added this tags into OSM?
Standard way to to this failed - loading all objects tagged with this in
If you enabled expert mode, you can download from Overpass directly into
JOSM.
Polyglot
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020, 23:29 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Jun 14, 2020, 22:55 by vosc...@gmail.com:
>
> Is it not possible to get people who were involved in the or
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 4:21 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
wrote:
> I created
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:fcode
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:ftype
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:reach_code
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:com_id
> a
On 15/6/20 1:37 am, patata wrote:
Currently socket:type1 and socket:type2 are not clarifying if the
station has a cable or we must bring our own.
Since the connector is not necessarily a socket,
Agreed.
it is being discussed
on our telegram group https://t.me/openchargemap to change all socke
On 15/6/20 1:09 am, Volker Schmidt wrote:
Regarding power lines: it is helpful mapping razed power lines as
razed and not removing them completely, because in many cases some of
the satellite pictures still show the towers, or at least the concrete
foundations. This way you avd resurrection.
On 14/6/20 10:59 pm, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote:
Martin Koppenhoefer:
==
Warin, can you give an example for something historic that is not
there any more in reality and should be removed from OpenStreetMap?
Through all the years I have never encountered anything like this
mapped in OpenStreetMap
Try
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/3382975
~ 10 years ago.
On 15/6/20 7:52 am, Jo wrote:
If you enabled expert mode, you can download from Overpass directly
into JOSM.
Polyglot
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020, 23:29 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org>> wrote:
27 matches
Mail list logo
