sent from a phone
> On 5. Jun 2020, at 10:14, European Water Project
> wrote:
>
> They also expressed interest in having more Mapillary images linked to OSM
> objects.
from the OpenStreetMap point of view it seems preferable to have the images we
link to available openly. If mapillary doe
Voting has ended after 14 days. There were 28 votes, 27 'yes' and one
'abstain'.
This means, the two keywords 'electric_bicycle' and 'speed_pedelec' have
been approved for use and two new vehicle categories have been
introduced. Let's see how this works out in our daily mapping tasks.
There we
Dear all,
for refining and more detailing how telephone-covers get tagged, I created a proposal that
adds four more values to the key "covered" for detailed mapping of public telephone's covers. I believe that the key covered=* is sufficient for that, added examples and tried to clea
On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 13:56, Jan Michel wrote:
> Voting has ended after 14 days. There were 28 votes, 27 'yes' and one
> 'abstain'.
> This means, the two keywords 'electric_bicycle' and 'speed_pedelec' have
> been approved for use and two new vehicle categories have been
> introduced. Let's see h
sent from a phone
> On 4. Jun 2020, at 16:56, Cornelis via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> Maybe this one even serves as example for an old railway that in fact
> should be mapped to explain these clearly visible features that
> otherwise would lack an explanation?
this is about a different topic: pro
sent from a phone
> On 6. Jun 2020, at 00:04, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> I do object strongly to the invitation to remove the razed/dismantled-railway
> tag in the case of railway tracks have been replaced by roads with the same
> geometry.
+1
Cheers Martin
___
On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 17:36, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > On 6. Jun 2020, at 00:04, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> > I do object strongly to the invitation to remove the
> > razed/dismantled-railway tag in the case of railway tracks have been
> > replaced by roads with the same geometry.
>
> +1
Do
On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 22:34, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> this is about a different topic: projects that have been started but have
> never been completed and the fragments are now either:
> repurposed
> or
> left to decay
> or
> waiting to be completed
>
> I would be quite interested in standa
On 31/5/20 9:20 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Yes, there are 1000 things in the Australian bush that'll kill you
:-), but none of them will actually eat you! (not even Drop Bears!
https://australianmuseum.net.au/learn/animals/mammals/drop-bear/ :-))
Same applies to (virtually?) all of Weste
>From: Jarek Piórkowski >>Do you also object when the geometry of the railway and the road is a>straight line? Do you think we should keep>https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676191068 ?>This rail company apparently went out of business 72 years ago? Mapillary images don't seem to show any trace of r
On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 19:17, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As for tagging 'dangerous areas' .. areas that pose danger such as some
> favelas cannot be tagged in OSM. I see the same logic applied to dangerous
> areas caused by wildlife.
Big difficulty in defining where to place cut-off f
11 matches
Mail list logo
