Re: [Tagging] relations & paths

2020-05-15 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
May 15, 2020, 08:28 by s8e...@runbox.com: > On Fri, 15 May 2020 01:53:37 +0200 (CEST), Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging > wrote: > >> Not sure is it the best place (someone again decided to go crazy with >> templates), but >> I made >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3

Re: [Tagging] relations & paths

2020-05-15 Thread s8evq
On Fri, 15 May 2020 11:28:42 +0200 (CEST), Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > BTW, I remember proposal about named roles and > that some people stuff signposts into route relations. I also never added signposts in route relations before. The original proposal on roles in hiking relations (

Re: [Tagging] relations & paths

2020-05-15 Thread Paul Allen
On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 03:21, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > Any signed route may be mapped as a route relation. > Depends how broadly or narrowly you define "signed route." > > And sometimes signed route will be signed with paint markings on trees, > or by

Re: [Tagging] relations & paths

2020-05-15 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 7:31 AM Paul Allen wrote: > I've encountered footpaths and bridleways that include farm service roads as > part of their route. So far, I've mapped the footpaths as the bits that > aren't > service roads. That renders the functionality of the ways but doesn't > encode in

Re: [Tagging] relations & paths

2020-05-15 Thread Paul Allen
On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 13:50, Kevin Kenny wrote: The relation can have ref, network (this is important), > Are those important in all instances or just the examples you gave? The footpaths and bridleways I deal with have references (in official records, not on signages) but are not part of a ne

Re: [Tagging] relations & paths

2020-05-15 Thread s8evq
On Fri, 15 May 2020 14:11:44 +0100, Paul Allen wrote: > On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 13:50, Kevin Kenny wrote: > > The relation can have ref, network (this is important), > > > > Are those important in all instances or just the examples you gave? The > footpaths and bridleways I deal with have refer

Re: [Tagging] relations & paths

2020-05-15 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:22 AM Paul Allen wrote: > Are those important in all instances or just the examples you gave? The > footpaths and bridleways I deal with have references (in official records, not > on signages) but are not part of a network. Sorry, I was unclear. Network is important fo

Re: [Tagging] relations & paths

2020-05-15 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:35 AM s8evq wrote: > The network key used on hiking/foot/horse/... relations "(...)indicates the > scope of the route." > (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:network#Bicycle.2C_hiking_and_other_recreational_routes), > so international, national, regional or local.

Re: [Tagging] relations & paths

2020-05-15 Thread Andy Townsend
On 15/05/2020 12:28, Paul Allen wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 03:21, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org>> wrote: Any signed route may be mapped as a route relation. Depends how broadly or narrowly you define "signed route." And sometimes signed route wil