> Currently there are two ways to tag a conservation area:
> boundary=national_park
> or
> boundary=protected_area + protect_class=1 to 7
There is also a third tag: leisure=nature_reserve, which is even more
common, and traditionally has been used for natural conservation areas
which are not Natio
On 7/4/20 5:27 pm, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
There is also a third tag: leisure=nature_reserve, which is even more
common, and traditionally has been used for natural conservation areas
which are not National Parks or similar.
Used 110k times:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dnatu
While doing my regular comparison of different sets of presets (see my
talk at SotM Milano for more information), one of the more noticeable
differences is the the presets that I maintain, and by extension JOSM,
does not include building=civic. This was introduced later than
building=public and by
Reservation, in my head, would steer me far away from doctors. They mean
somewhat similar things, but reservation conjures up more of a restaurant with
full service than a doctor's office or clinic.
My definition of reservation is: "A reservation is a hold on a table at a
restaurant"
My definit
Le 07.04.20 à 12:19, Simon Poole a écrit :
> is here any actual differentiation between the two values
both are often badly used to describe the current function
of the building and not what it look like.
the description of building=civic said "A building hosting any civic
amenity", so it's nothi
It doesn't really matter if I think the current mixup of use-based vs.
style building values is particular useful or not, I still need to be
able to display (and suggest) them in a meaningful way.
Am 07.04.2020 um 15:13 schrieb Marc M.:
> Le 07.04.20 à 12:19, Simon Poole a écrit :
>> is here any
Although I also see a lot of overlap, I could imagine public buildings to be a
bigger category of which civic buildings are only a part, according to your
culture and context, one could imagine public buildings that aren’t civic
buildings such as churches and temples.
I could also imagine peop
sent from a phone
> On 7. Apr 2020, at 09:28, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>
> But if Wikidata is already storing this info, maybe we don’t need a tag for
> it?
if the information is useful for us, or maybe even essential to understand the
nature of the thing, then we should have the informatio
sent from a phone
> On 7. Apr 2020, at 11:41, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>
> boundary=national_park is an *existing* tag that is used to tag "a relatively
> large area of land" that is "set aside for human recreation and enjoyment, as
> well as the protection of the natural environment and/or cu
