Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Refugee Site Location

Dear Joseph, A couple of questions as the use of a clean namespace will all data segregated seems appealing : 1. If refugee_site were added to the local polygon_keys object you mentioned, how long would it take for the effects of this updated object to propagate ? A couple of weeks, months ? Fin

Re: [Tagging] Can highway=cycleway be limited to MTB?

On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 20:53 +0200, Florimond Berthoux wrote: > For this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7wbi4wGbsg (Andrew's > example) > We're on the edge of tags definition : this a path limited cyclist, > where a mountain bike almost mandatory to ride there. Some features > help the cyclist

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Refugee Site Location

> If refugee_site were added to the local polygon_keys object you mentioned, > how long would it take for the effects of this updated object to propagate? Now that I've re-read the full text of the new proposal, it looks like the author is intending refugee_site=* to be added to a feature which i

Re: [Tagging] Can highway=cycleway be limited to MTB?

Le sam. 4 avr. 2020 à 10:18, Snusmumriken a écrit : > On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 20:53 +0200, Florimond Berthoux wrote: > > For this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7wbi4wGbsg (Andrew's > > example) > > We're on the edge of tags definition : this a path limited cyclist, > > where a mountain bike

Re: [Tagging] Can highway=cycleway be limited to MTB?

Le 04.04.20 à 11:26, Florimond Berthoux a écrit : > > Le sam. 4 avr. 2020 à 10:18, Snusmumriken a écrit : > > On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 20:53 +0200, Florimond Berthoux wrote: > > For this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7wbi4wGbsg (Andrew's > > example) > > We're on the edge of t

Re: [Tagging] Can highway=cycleway be limited to MTB?

On Saturday, 4 April 2020, 11:55:01 CEST, Marc M. wrote: > Le 04.04.20 à 11:26, Florimond Berthoux a écrit : > > > > Le sam. 4 avr. 2020 à 10:18, Snusmumriken a écrit : > > > >    On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 20:53 +0200, Florimond Berthoux wrote: > >    > For this one https://www.youtube.c

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Refugee Site Location

Hi Joseph, Yes, agree that given the above constraints it makes sense to use this namespace as an attachment to a node or an area which has a main top-level key already included in the local polygon keys object.What is the process for requesting to have a new key added to the local polygon_key

Re: [Tagging] Can highway=cycleway be limited to MTB?

On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 5:28 AM Florimond Berthoux wrote: > bicycle=yes is an access tag it says only that cyclist has a legal right to > ride there. > «Key:bicycle Legal restriction for bicycles. » > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle > It doesn't say anything about it difficulties

Re: [Tagging] Can highway=cycleway be limited to MTB?

> The key issue with that approach: how does a mapper who isn't expert > enough to grade accurately the difficulty of a MTB trail, but can > clearly see, 'a road bike wouldn't work here', tag the thing > appropriately? Simple 'highway=path foot=yes bicycle=yes' invites > routing disasters. I can,

Re: [Tagging] Can highway=cycleway be limited to MTB?

Am Sa., 4. Apr. 2020 um 13:21 Uhr schrieb Morten Lange via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org>: > > >> We're on the edge of tags definition : this a path limited > cyclist, > > >> where a mountain bike almost mandatory to ride there. Some > features > > >> help the cyclist. > > > > >

Re: [Tagging] Can highway=cycleway be limited to MTB?

Le 04.04.20 à 15:47, Kevin Kenny a écrit : > how does a mapper who isn't expert enough to grade accurately > the difficulty of a MTB trail, but can > clearly see, 'a road bike wouldn't work here' it's very subjective an example of a situation that was not well described with surface/inclined/... t

Re: [Tagging] Can highway=cycleway be limited to MTB?

mtb:scale is not mandatory. If you are not familiar with the MTB scale don't put it. Put what you see: surface; smoothness; width; visibility ; ... Virus-free. www.avast.com

Re: [Tagging] Can highway=cycleway be limited to MTB?

building=* is also not mandatory, that doesn't prevent a lot of ppl to use building=yes :) any better idea to solve Kevin's question? Le 05.04.20 à 00:13, Volker Schmidt a écrit : > mtb:scale is not mandatory. > If you are not familiar with the MTB scale don't put it. Put what you > see: surface;

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - protection_class=* (Words, not numeric codes)

Kevin, Would you have time to move this proposal forward? I've been looking at the protected_area classes, and there are several that are confusing and overlap with other features, especially protected_class = 7, 19, 21, 29, 97, 98, 99. And several are duplicates of more common tags: boundary=n