Hi
Communal bins in parks etc for the disposal of hot ash or single-use
tray barbecues. Unable to find the appropriate tag in the wiki or
taginfo. Suggestions?
PS
Is anyone as irritated as I am by the shortening to 'bbq'. It seems to
serve no beneficial purpose & consensus/convention is that
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 17:27, Dave F via Tagging
wrote:
>
> Communal bins in parks etc for the disposal of hot ash or single-use
> tray barbecues. Unable to find the appropriate tag in the wiki or
> taginfo. Suggestions?
>
amenity=waste_basket (or waste_disposal if it's very big) + waste=*
seems
Gah. Using a laptop and the keys are not quite where I expect them.
Sorry for the partial message.
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 17:59, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 17:27, Dave F via Tagging <
> tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Communal bins in parks etc for the disposal of hot
sent from a phone
> On 18. Mar 2020, at 18:27, Dave F via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> Communal bins in parks etc for the disposal of hot ash or single-use tray
> barbecues. Unable to find the appropriate tag in the wiki or taginfo.
> Suggestions?
I recall this has been discussed some time ago, b
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 03:27, Dave F via Tagging
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Communal bins in parks etc for the disposal of hot ash or single-use
> tray barbecues.
Are you even allowed to dispose of hot ashes in your bins? I know our
Council-supplied domestic rubbish bins are marked "No hot ashes", mainly
On 19/3/20 4:27 am, Dave F via Tagging wrote:
Hi
Communal bins in parks etc for the disposal of hot ash or single-use
tray barbecues. Unable to find the appropriate tag in the wiki or
taginfo. Suggestions?
The subject sounds like the disposal of the complete bbq.
Most of the public bbqs h
Graeme Fitzpatrick writes:
> Is anyone as irritated as I am by the shortening to 'bbq'.
>
> Sorry, no - it's a standard term, at least around here! :-)
I am irritated by the misuse of barbecue to refer to large class of
anything to do with a grill. Barbecue properly refers to cooking at low
hea
Hi,
While there are methods of entering street addresses there don't appear
to be any way to enter addresses that use Post Office Boxes and other
delivery types.
There is a proposal to may the existence of PO Boxes but no way to enter the
address data for those that use them.
As well as PO
Hi all,
Following several discussions last month, including this one:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-February/051385.html
Here is a proposal regarding pumps, obvious devices we all more or less
know in industries or at home.
This knowledge is useful for water management, w
François,
Could you please simplify the "==Proposal==" section and make it 100% clear:
1) What new Keys and Tags (Key=Value) are being approved by the proposal
2) What old Keys and Tags are being deprecated
3) Move the Proposal section to the top, before Rationale, so people
will be clear on what
I oppose deprecating pump=powered, pump=manual, and pump=no. This is a
simple, clear system for use with water wells, and it is widely
supported.
1) Clarify use with man_made=water_well
Currently 88% of uses of pump=* are with man_made=water_well (the rest
are with amenity=drinking_water) and wit
> there don't appear to be any way to enter addresses that use Post Office Boxes
Post office boxes are located at a post office usually, and that is
mapped as amenity=post_office -
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpost_office
> other delivery types:
> Roadside Delivery RSD
> Roa
On 19/3/20 1:57 pm, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
there don't appear to be any way to enter addresses that use Post Office Boxes
Post office boxes are located at a post office usually, and that is
mapped as amenity=post_office -
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpost_office
I am not
“32 Tennant Creek” won’t work?
As mentioned, addr:full could work
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:48 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19/3/20 1:57 pm, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>
> there don't appear to be any way to enter addresses that use Post Office Boxes
>
> Post office boxes are locat
Since pumps have been a manufactured commodity for about 400 years (
https://www.worldpumps.com/general-processing/features/a-brief-history-of-pumps/
) there is an abundance of existing typologies and taxonomies dealing with
pumps. If the goal is a general tagging scheme that can further be refined
On 19/3/20 3:00 pm, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
“32 Tennant Creek” won’t work?
Tennant creek has a number of streets that could contain '32', it would not be
considered 'correct addressing' by the postal service..
Putting addr:street=PRIVATE BAG 32 could work but there is no street 'PRIVATE
BAG
16 matches
Mail list logo
