Re: [Tagging] Public refrigerators

2020-02-29 Thread Markus Peloso
I find amenity=give_box is different from amenity=food_sharing as a shop=general is different from shop=supermarket. In Switzerland if I go into a supermarket I found products of daily hygiene but the main thing is about shopping for food. The main thing by a give box is about sharing items. In

[Tagging] How to map an OpenStreetMap map?

2020-02-29 Thread Rory McCann
In OSM, large map boards can be mapped as `tourist=information,information=map`. OSM is pretty good quality, so now some of these maps are based on OSM data. Is there anyway to record this in OSM? IMO, you don't need a reason to map something, but one benefit is to help people promote OSM. If

Re: [Tagging] How to map an OpenStreetMap map?

2020-02-29 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
29 Feb 2020, 11:58 by r...@technomancy.org: >  Do yous think `map_source=openstreetmap` is a good tag? > Yes, though I think that posting the same thread to tagging and talk ml is a poor idea.___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://

Re: [Tagging] Mapping pumps

2020-02-29 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
28 Feb 2020, 23:51 by fl.infosrese...@gmail.com: > Hi all, > > One simple question : according to you, what is the most suitable key to use > to map pumps? > A device intended to raise pressure level of any fluid. > Depends on a pump. Some are not mappable (pump in small private aquarium, tho

Re: [Tagging] Mapping pumps

2020-02-29 Thread François Lacombe
Thank you all for answers Let's go for man_made=pump There are indeed many sorts of pumps and they would require a bunch of tags to be described. We'll see that point in a formal proposal All the best François Le sam. 29 févr. 2020 à 13:36, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap

Re: [Tagging] How to map an OpenStreetMap map?

2020-02-29 Thread Warin
On 29/2/20 11:30 pm, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: 29 Feb 2020, 11:58 by r...@technomancy.org:  Do yous think `map_source=openstreetmap` is a good tag? Yes, though I think that posting the same thread to tagging and talk ml is a poor idea. I think source_map=* or source:map=* w

Re: [Tagging] How to map an OpenStreetMap map?

2020-02-29 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 29. Feb 2020, at 22:25, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> `map_source=openstreetmap` is a good tag? >> Yes, though I think that posting >> the same thread to tagging and talk ml >> is a poor idea. > > I think source_map=* or source:map=* would be better as that c

Re: [Tagging] How to map an OpenStreetMap map?

2020-02-29 Thread Warin
On 1/3/20 8:31 am, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 29. Feb 2020, at 22:25, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: `map_source=openstreetmap` is a good tag? Yes, though I think that posting the same thread to tagging and talk ml is a poor idea. I think source_map=* or s

Re: [Tagging] How to map an OpenStreetMap map?

2020-02-29 Thread Jarek Piórkowski
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 at 16:41, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/3/20 8:31 am, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > On 29. Feb 2020, at 22:25, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I think source_map=* or source:map=* would be better as that can also be >>> used for other specific 'sources'. >

Re: [Tagging] How to map an OpenStreetMap map?

2020-02-29 Thread Andrew Harvey
But those uses are mostly the source the mapper used to find out about the tag they are adding, which is different to the source of the map. source:map=survey means I got the map=* key from a survey. So if you use map:source=openstreetmap then source:map:source=survey says I found it as being a m

Re: [Tagging] How to map an OpenStreetMap map?

2020-02-29 Thread Warin
On 1/3/20 8:50 am, Andrew Harvey wrote: But those uses are mostly the source the mapper used to find out about the tag they are adding, which is different to the source of the map. source:map=survey means I got the map=* key from a survey. So if you use map:source=openstreetmap then source:map

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - hiking_trail_relation_roles

2020-02-29 Thread Peter Elderson
I think the proposal is not ready for use or for voting, but there does not seem to be much progress. The basics are clear enough I think. Though I myself would have made things even simpler (e.g. not bother with functions like approach or excursion, but simply use alternative and branch as role