Re: [Tagging] Clarify explicit abstention when voting on a proposal

2020-02-27 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Do., 27. Feb. 2020 um 08:34 Uhr schrieb Andrew Davidson < thesw...@gmail.com>: > On Thu, 27 Feb. 2020, 08:22 Martin Koppenhoefer, > wrote: > >> >> can you explain with the amended rules what the outcome would be for >> >> 8 votes yes, 0 no, 1 abstention >> > > That is 8 unanimous approval vote

Re: [Tagging] man_made=gas_well Was man_made=petroleum_well vs man_made=pumping_rig

2020-02-27 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Do., 27. Feb. 2020 um 00:23 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg < joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>: > Different tags are used for petroleum wells vs water wells because > they look totally different do they? Have a look at this short clip that shows a water well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lkoCCCQ

Re: [Tagging] Sorting waterway relations?

2020-02-27 Thread Colin Smale
On 2020-02-27 01:47, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > When you make or sort a relation of type=waterway, do you check if the > source or mouth of the river is first on the list of ways? > > Another user just suggested that the spring/source of the waterway > should start the list, then the mouth of the

Re: [Tagging] man_made=gas_well Was man_made=petroleum_well vs man_made=pumping_rig

2020-02-27 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Do., 27. Feb. 2020 um 01:33 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg < joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>: > > Christmas trees are intended to regulate the well pressure or manage > filling product injection to raise field pressure. > > You'll find them independently on oil or water wells depending on the > press

Re: [Tagging] Sorting waterway relations?

2020-02-27 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
27 Feb 2020, 09:55 by colin.sm...@xs4all.nl: > > If it was semantically important, we should be scanning for and flagging up > waterways with out-of-order ways.> The fact that we are not, shows that the > ordering of the ways is not essential for a correct geometrical > interpretationQED

Re: [Tagging] man_made=gas_well Was man_made=petroleum_well vs man_made=pumping_rig

2020-02-27 Thread Steve Doerr
On 26/02/2020 23:22, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: According to these sources, the term "petroleum" can include both natural gas and crude oil: Someone had better tell the Oxford English Dictionary they've got it wrong then: 'petroleum, n. [..] A viscous liquid, consisting chiefly of a mixture of

Re: [Tagging] Sorting waterway relations?

2020-02-27 Thread Colin Smale
On 2020-02-27 10:04, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > 27 Feb 2020, 09:55 by colin.sm...@xs4all.nl: > >> If it was semantically important, we should be scanning for and flagging up >> waterways with out-of-order ways.The fact that we are not, shows that the >> ordering of the ways is not

Re: [Tagging] man_made=gas_well Was man_made=petroleum_well vs man_made=pumping_rig

2020-02-27 Thread François Lacombe
Le jeu. 27 févr. 2020 à 08:34, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> a écrit : > > +1 There are some ultra-deep drillings for water, but are functionally > different both from water well and petroleum wells. > > Single tag for petroleum wells and water wells seems to me > an o

Re: [Tagging] Clarify explicit abstention when voting on a proposal

2020-02-27 Thread Paul Allen
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 08:34, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > I see, so now the abstentions will not count for the voting result in any > way, not even for the quorum. > That is the technical meaning of "abstention." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstention An abstention is when no vote is cast e

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Food sharing

2020-02-27 Thread Hauke Stieler
Hi, sometimes people just use boxes or the basket of an old bicycle for food sharing purposes. Because they are usually not inside a building or something, I would add the "covered=*" tag to your list. I also would use the "contact:*" keys (for the website, facebook, other social media channels,

Re: [Tagging] Clarify explicit abstention when voting on a proposal

2020-02-27 Thread Markus
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 15:06, Paul Allen wrote: > > However, despite the option being labelled an abstention, it is NOT an > abstention. > Technically, it is a "spoiled ballot." Spoiled ballots DO contribute to a > quorum in > most voting systems. [...] Really? Wikipedia says [1]: In voting,

Re: [Tagging] Clarify explicit abstention when voting on a proposal

2020-02-27 Thread Paul Allen
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 18:56, Markus wrote: > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 15:06, Paul Allen wrote: > > > > However, despite the option being labelled an abstention, it is NOT an > abstention. > > Technically, it is a "spoiled ballot." Spoiled ballots DO contribute to > a quorum in > > most voting sy

Re: [Tagging] Annual Shows

2020-02-27 Thread John Willis via Tagging
I can’t see why we can’t create a simple tourism=outdoor_event pin at the location of the event and list it’s time in something like event=seasonal/ date / existing time mapping, and could use admin_level for scale - and use additional tags ina relation for larger events or micromapping. we hav

Re: [Tagging] Annual Shows

2020-02-27 Thread Warin
Some questions... and observations. On 28/2/20 10:48 am, John Willis via Tagging wrote: I can’t see why we can’t create a simple tourism=outdoor_event pin at the location of the event and list it’s time in something like event=seasonal/ date / existing time mapping, and could use admin_level f