Nobody else about this key? To be honest I have another example of
"recycling:" (not recycling) that are the batteries... So it's another
point to the idea that recycling is a namespace and diapers could be added
to the list.
Thanks
Francesco
Il mer 5 feb 2020, 13:53 Francesco Ansanelli ha
scritt
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 02:52:22PM +0100, Francesco Ansanelli wrote:
> Nobody else about this key? To be honest I have another example of
> "recycling:" (not recycling) that are the batteries... So it's another
> point to the idea that recycling is a namespace and diapers could be added
> to the li
Il sab 15 feb 2020, 15:25 ael ha scritto:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 02:52:22PM +0100, Francesco Ansanelli wrote:
> > Nobody else about this key? To be honest I have another example of
> > "recycling:" (not recycling) that are the batteries... So it's another
> > point to the idea that recycling i
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/in-kind_donation
For a place that takes in-kind donations.
Hi
I describe a tag for shop and amenity that takes in-kind donations. I'm
interested in your opinions.
Best regards,
Markus
___
Tagging
Hi,
I have some feedback for you:
1.)
I'm not a native English spearker and personally never heard of "in-kind
donations" before, so maybe a short description/definition might be
needed/helpful.
2.)
According to [0] the convention for separation word in a key is the
underscore. So I would change
Hi all,
there's the "bollard" key with documented value "rising" and "removable"
[0] but I often encounter also bollards which cannot be removed easily.
I would love to see the "unremovable" value in the documentation. Should
I open a proposal page for this one value? That sounds a bit of an
overk
Yeah, Also noticed that when mapping bollards. I'd vote on such a proposal
yeah 👍
Not sure if proposals are needed for changes this small. But I'd love to
hear other people's feedback as well yeah
On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 19:54, Hauke Stieler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> there's the "bollard" key with do
I think that by default bollards are not removable, and that if a bollard
is not tagged as removable, it is reasonable to assume it's not removable.
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 6:54 PM Hauke Stieler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> there's the "bollard" key with documented value "rising" and "removable"
> [0] b
On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 15:16, John Sturdy wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 6:54 PM Hauke Stieler wrote:
>> there's the "bollard" key with documented value "rising" and "removable"
>> [0] but I often encounter also bollards which cannot be removed easily.
>> I would love to see the "unremovable" v
I think that's a bad assumption to make. Could just be that nobody bothered
to tag it
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020, 21:17 John Sturdy wrote:
> I think that by default bollards are not removable, and that if a bollard
> is not tagged as removable, it is reasonable to assume it's not removable.
>
> On Sat
I don't have real data to check your statement (except the mapped
bollards in OSM) but personally I don't know if that's true for all
regions. I personally have the feeling that the amount is at least equal
and in Hamburg, Germany I have the impression that more bollars are
removable then unremovab
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 08:15:32PM +, John Sturdy wrote:
> I think that by default bollards are not removable, and that if a bollard
> is not tagged as removable, it is reasonable to assume it's not removable.
+1
ael
___
Tagging mailing list
Taggi
I have tagged around 1k bollards without "removable" or "raising", because
they looked reasonably difficult to remove, even thought most likely nearly
all of them are in one way or the other removable and not really fixed.
My interpretation of the the absence of these tags has been that the object
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 15 feb 2020, alle ore 18:46, Hauke Stieler
> ha scritto:
>
> 2.)
> According to [0] the convention for separation word in a key is the
> underscore. So I would change the key to "in_place_donations".
right, the underscore replaces spaces between words in formal
14 matches
Mail list logo
