Unpaved and paved values are valuable values.
It is not possible to tag the word with precision, all values are
imprecision of the real world.
Just some are more precise than others.
StreetComplete can have a quest for that, and there is a ticket about it
https://github.com/westnordost/StreetCompl
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:38:14PM +, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
> Asphalt is certainly not an unnecessary tag in the UK.
>
> Whilst its safe to assume all roads are paved unless tagged otherwise. A
> small number of lesser roads may not be paved.
>
> The same assumptions cannot be made about
Both options do not support established and documented tagging. The way to
manage this kind of change is to discuss a road to better tagging
while keeping rendering of the established tagging until this has been
accomplished. If retagging is a part of improvement, time should be allowed
to get this
Hi there.
I've stumbled with a problem for which I couldn't find a satisfactory
answer.
Say I have a destination sign in a motorway junction exit with 4
destinations, but only the second one has a ref. How do we match the
right destination with its ref?
I've noticed that we can use "none" in the
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 9:07 AM António Madeira via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> I've stumbled with a problem for which I couldn't find a satisfactory
> answer.
> Say I have a destination sign in a motorway junction exit with 4
> destinations, but only the second one
Hi,
You can just add empty entries to the destination:ref tag, like
destination:ref=;123;;
Some people prefer to use 'none' instead of empty entries, but I would
not recommend that.
I don't know if you have found it, but there is some documentation I
wrote in the Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.
Thank you, Jan!
This was exactly what I was searching for.
So, for destination:ref you propose using ";;" for empty values and for
destination:symbol you propose "none"?
How come this is not in the destination tag wiki?
Às 13:30 de 13/02/2020, Jan Michel escreveu:
Hi,
You can just add empty e
On 13.02.20 18:02, António Madeira via Tagging wrote:
Thank you, Jan!
This was exactly what I was searching for.
So, for destination:ref you propose using ";;" for empty values and for
destination:symbol you propose "none"?
There are different options:
destination:ref = ;123;;
destination:ref =
This was of a great help, Jan. That tool is awesome!
Wouldn't it be the right time to go ahead with this proposal? I mean,
this is used for most of the routing softwares that uses OSM, including
OSMAnd.
Às 14:17 de 13/02/2020, Jan Michel escreveu:
On 13.02.20 18:02, António Madeira via Tagging
Hi,
just a reminder that voting ends on Saturday ;)
Hauke
On 28.01.20 21:38, Hauke Stieler wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I finally set the status to "voting" of the tax-free proposal. This ends
> on 2020-02-15 (a bit more than two weeks).
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/t
10 matches
Mail list logo
