On Tuesday, 11 February 2020, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> OK, you confirm that the "paved is implied" statement in the wiki page is
> to be read as "assuming we are in Germany ... paved is implied" and is not
> referring to some wiki page that I have not yet detected (that was my
> question).
> I have
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:14:54AM +, Philip Barnes wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 February 2020, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> > OK, you confirm that the "paved is implied" statement in the wiki page is
> > to be read as "assuming we are in Germany ... paved is implied" and is not
> > referring to some wik
On 12/02/2020 11:51, ael wrote:
+1. Some of the Amazon people do seem to be adding unnecessary and
unsurveyed surface=asphalt tags to many roads in the UK which I find
quite irritating.
If anyone's adding surface=asphalt when it isn't I'd definitely raise
that via a changeset discussion comm
On 2/11/20 09:51, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> Do we have any agreed implied surface values for the different street
> categories ? per country?
>
> I noticed this phrase
> "in many cases this is implied by the way itself (for highway=trunk to
> highway=residential, paved is implied) "
> on the page
>
On 2/12/20 05:51, ael wrote:
> +1. Some of the Amazon people do seem to be adding unnecessary and
> unsurveyed surface=asphalt tags to many roads in the UK which I find
> quite irritating.
The most I usually do without a survey is surface=paved or
surface=unpaved, with exceptions when I can see cl
As a cyclist living in city with too many road with (bad) setts I’m happy
to know when a road is asphalt or not.
@Volker, wiki says that only trunk and motorway imply paved, check their
pages.
Though like I already said, implying tags is bad because it let data reader
guess what you think is impl
Volker Schmidt wrote:
> Do we have any agreed implied surface values for the different
> street categories ? per country?
We had this thread already, didn't we?
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-September/048330.html
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-Sep
Hi,
There is an ongoing discussion to clarify if whatever explicit
abstaining is the same as no vote during the process of approving a
proposal. [1] Please feel free to participate in the discussion.
Happy mapping.
Regards,
Daniel
[1]
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposal_pro
Feb 12, 2020, 12:51 by witwa...@disroot.org:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:14:54AM +, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, 11 February 2020, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>> > OK, you confirm that the "paved is implied" statement in the wiki page is
>> > to be read as "assuming we are in Germany ..
Hi,
we have a big inconsistency between different wiki pages and editors how we
define the roof shape "saltbox".
1) A saltbox is a roof with a tilted part at left and right side and a flat
part on top. This definition can be found at:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings
It is
Le 12 février 2020 14:26:26 GMT-05:00, Michael Brandtner via Tagging
a écrit :
>Hi,
>we have a big inconsistency between different wiki pages and editors
>how we define the roof shape "saltbox".
>1) A saltbox is a roof with a tilted part at left and right side and a
>flat part on top. This defin
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 07:15:42PM +0100, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>
> >> >
> >> In the UK too paved is implied, I have never used paved. Surface tags such
> >> as asphalt, setts, concrete add the detail of what sort of paved.
> >>
> >
> > +1. Some of the Amazon people do seem to be
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 12 feb 2020, alle ore 20:41, Julien Lepiller ha
> scritto:
>
> Also for some reason, this tag is different from what wikipedia describes a
> saltbox to be: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saltbox_house
the shape of OpenStreetMap-4D fits with the wikipedia articl
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 2:41 PM Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Also for some reason, this tag is different from what wikipedia describes a
> saltbox to be: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saltbox_house
The Wikipedia article describes the form that I always understood to
be a 'saltbox house' - two storey
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 5:21 PM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> the shape of OpenStreetMap-4D fits with the wikipedia article, although the
> article suggests this is a specific New England building type, which makes
> the term less suitable for a global roof type tag.
Few others build in that sha
On Wednesday, 12 February 2020, ael wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 07:15:42PM +0100, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
> >
> > >> >
> > >> In the UK too paved is implied, I have never used paved. Surface tags
> > >> such as asphalt, setts, concrete add the detail of what sort of paved.
>
That can be a problem. If I survey streets on ground it is problematic
if it is tagged in such way. Then I struggle with a map app that show me
the surface, but with no visible difference between a sett or similar
surface or just surface=paved. Additionally I use StreetComple to find
missing surfac
See a suggestion by Christoph at
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3844#issuecomment-583848782:
"If anyone wants to develop a followup to this change - i prepared two
branches that could be helpful:
1)
https://github.com/imagico/osm-carto-alternative-colors/tree/no-barrier
An opinion from an OSM neophyte
Abstain should mean just that .. either no vote .. or a blank vote..
It is important to understand why someone chooses to abstain instead of
voting against a proposal.
An abstainer has serious reservations about a specific detail of the
proposal, but believes the
19 matches
Mail list logo
