Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Small electric vehicles

>.>they? Why didn’t you do something about it? > (or are you asking for bicycles with sidecars?) >generally I agree, exceptions apply. In the motorcar example they are grounded >in real life particularities (best reason I’d say). >... I am a part of the they, then it was not within m

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Small electric vehicles

Am Mi., 11. Dez. 2019 um 13:29 Uhr schrieb Allroads : > > Lately I wrote down for myself some thoughts. > 1. A traffic sign (combination) should preferably be tagged with as few > tags as possible. > 2. A traffic sign should preferably be tagged as directly as possible with > tags. > 3. Neutralizi

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - hiking_trail_relation_roles

> On Dec 9, 2019, at 6:36 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > individual ways that have the direction, not the entire relation. some routes (made of many overlapping pieces of trail) are considered ascents and decents. the named “trail" is made of the ascent route and descent route.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - hiking_trail_relation_roles

On 12/12/19 16:00, John Willis via Tagging wrote: On Dec 9, 2019, at 6:36 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: individual ways that have the direction, not the entire relation. some routes (made of many overlapping pieces of trail) are considered ascents