What would be the best tagging for guard booth minibuildings?
I think that building=guard_booth would be the best one for objects constructed
as guard booth.
Such objects are housing guard, usually at entrance to parking lot, industrial
complex,
closed private residential complex, military base
Guardhouse / guard post / sentry box?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
“Booth” implies that one wall is missing (open). A guardhouse would be
more completely enclosed, I think. So either could work, depending on the
building design.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 4:14 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Guardhouse / guard post / sentry box?
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
> ___
I have covered this on previous posts but I think it is ready for RFC and then
in two weeks voting.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dopen_defecation
I have covered other options in the past eg landcover=open_defecation or
open_defecation=yes but these were not ap
> One problem with enforcing a single tag by mappers or preprocessing> data before putting it in the database is that if there are subtle distinctions they are> forever lost.Sven gave us a list of tags which have exact meaning. So no distinctions. No differences, just another names.e.g. `phone` is
On 07/10/19 18:59, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
“Booth” implies that one wall is missing (open). A guardhouse would
be more completely enclosed, I think. So either could work, depending
on the building design.
Would be preferable to have a tag that has no implied restrictions.
Possibly guard_pos
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 2:59 AM Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> “Booth” implies that one wall is missing (open).
>
I thought that was an adirondack?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Am Mo., 7. Okt. 2019 um 09:09 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny <
matkoni...@tutanota.com>:
> What would be the best tagging for guard booth minibuildings?
>
> I think that building=guard_booth would be the best one for objects
> constructed
> as guard booth.
>
I agree on the selection of building f
>From what I have read (few personal experience) I find it difficult to use
the landuse-key for this, because it implies to me that the area is mainly
used for open defecation (and has significant extent). If this is what you
want to describe, the tag is fine. In many other cases I believe we would
> There are too many on both sides who insist that their way is the one
true way.
Actually, there is something pretty close to 'one TRUE way'. There are some
things in the Dataverse that are used by everybody, and everybody uses
everybody else's stuff. And when the Internet arrived they set up co
How about porters_lodge, it's more general. It would cover the small building
at the entrance of outdoor pools where you buy the tickets, same for other
outdoor venues, the booth at the entrance of company/factory grounds, the guard
booth at the entrance of gated communities etc.
Not sure if th
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 20:55, Tobias Zwick wrote:
> How about porters_lodge, it's more general. It would cover the small
> building at the entrance of outdoor pools where you buy the tickets, same
> for other outdoor venues, the booth at the entrance of company/factory
> grounds, the guard booth a
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 3:13 PM Michael Patrick wrote:
> rarely are doers and users exposed to the full complexity, just the simple
> subset of what is needed for a particular use case.
I think that's a claim that needs to be demonstrated. Certainly, the
complexity of the contact:* schema and th
sent from a phone
> On 7. Oct 2019, at 22:40, Kevin Kenny wrote:
>
> I think that's a claim that needs to be demonstrated. Certainly, the
> complexity of the contact:* schema and the variety of both editors and
> data consumers has proven to be a barrier to widespread acceptance.
frankly I a
sent from a phone
> On 7. Oct 2019, at 21:52, Tobias Zwick wrote:
>
> Not sure if this word is common in English, I just looked up the translation
> of the German word for that.
I am not sure what you have translated, but I would re-translate this back as
Pförtnerloge, which is not exactly
> let’s us all save a lot of typing and let’s bury the contact: - prefix.The time will come at least I will try to accomplish this.~ Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram Original Message Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Phone)From: Martin Koppenhoefer To: "Tag discussion
16 matches
Mail list logo
