Re: [Tagging] Distinguishing landuse=animal_keeping from landuse=farmyard and landuse=meadow?

2019-08-23 Thread Paul Allen
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 03:29, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > Also, it's not clear to me when one would use landuse=animal_keeping > instead of landuse=farmyard or landuse=meadow. If a farm has a paddock > for horses next to the barn and farmhouse, is this landuse=farmyard? > First, it depends what

Re: [Tagging] Distinguishing landuse=animal_keeping from landuse=farmyard and landuse=meadow?

2019-08-23 Thread Hufkratzer
An old related discussion about "paddock": https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/30491/horse-corral-or-any-dirt-area On 23.08.2019 10:36, Paul Allen wrote: > On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 03:29, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > > Also, it's not clear to me when one would use landuse=animal_keeping

Re: [Tagging] Distinguishing landuse=animal_keeping from landuse=farmyard and landuse=meadow?

2019-08-23 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
Hufkratzer, do you know when landuse=animal_keeping should be used instead of landuse=farmyard or landuse=meadow? (The linked forum discussion was originally about a riding arena or riding ground, which should be tagged leisure=pitch, sport=equestrian. I don't think that's an issue. An equestrian

Re: [Tagging] bear box in campground ?

2019-08-23 Thread Dave Swarthout
Alaska, with its huge population of bears, has these bear-proof receptacles at all public campsites. I think bear_box will serve the purpose but it doesn't work for other types of animal-proof containers as Joseph pointed out. However, those other types are not very common, if they exist at all. S

Re: [Tagging] bear box in campground ?

2019-08-23 Thread Paul Allen
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 18:43, Dave Swarthout wrote: > > Still, if we want to allow for easy expansion of the tagging scheme then > using waste_basket=bear-proof, for example, would help such future > expansion. > How about bear_proof=yes which could be applied to food storage containers and wast

Re: [Tagging] bear box in campground ?

2019-08-23 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:12 PM Paul Allen wrote: > On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 18:43, Dave Swarthout > wrote: > >> >> Still, if we want to allow for easy expansion of the tagging scheme then >> using waste_basket=bear-proof, for example, would help such future >> expansion. >> > > How about bear_pro

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] 140 000 shops of unspecified type

2019-08-23 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
Openstreetmap-carto, the map style used in the "Standard" layer on openstreetmap.org, will stop rendering features tagged with only "shop=yes" next release (probably next month). See: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3718 - which removes the rendering Also see discussion a

Re: [Tagging] bear box in campground ?

2019-08-23 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
I've added amenity=bear_box (for the feature) and bear_box=yes (as a property to add to campsites, caravan sites, camp pitches, etc) to the proposal at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Campsite_properties for now. i If it turns out to be too controversial I can remove it for

Re: [Tagging] Proposed removal of rendering support for natural=marsh in Openstreetmap-carto style

2019-08-23 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
This change has now been made: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3829 When the next release happens, probably in the next month, natural=marsh will no longer be rendered in the Openstreetmap-carto style, used on the "Standard" layer for openstreetmap.org. This feature has b