I agree, but it also says don't expect it to be rendered or routed, it's a
fixme error. Mappers have used and will use 'unclassified' because they
want rendering and routing without bothering about the classification.
Fr gr Peter Elderson
Op ma 5 aug. 2019 om 09:56 schreef Warin <61sundow...@gm
sent from a phone
> On 5. Aug 2019, at 07:06, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> Which of those do carry names typically? I cant see any?
alleys
Cheers Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tag
Hi, Martin.
Yes, I agree. A bullring is a stadium, a type (or subtype) of stadium:
"building=stadium".
Regards,
Daniel
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f5258744.html
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://list
sent from a phone
> On 6. Aug 2019, at 05:33, Tod Fitch wrote:
>
> When I walk down a street collecting house numbers I have no indication of
> the ZIP code of each building. If you require ZIP codes then I am forced into
> an import situation rather than a field survey
you might survey th
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 08:49, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> > On 5. Aug 2019, at 07:06, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> >
> > Which of those do carry names typically? I cant see any?
>
> alleys
>
Typically? In some parts of the world, maybe. In others, not so much. Of
the three I
can think of in my
sent from a phone
> On 6. Aug 2019, at 11:15, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Typically? In some parts of the world, maybe. In others, not so much. Of
> the three I
> can think of in my town, none have names.
>
> Side-note. Those three alleys give access to the rear gardens of the houses
> either
On Tuesday, 6 August 2019, Warin wrote:
> On 06/08/19 09:19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> >
> > sent from a phone
> >
> >> On 6. Aug 2019, at 00:20, dcapillae wrote:
> >>
> >> Um, I don't think anyone in Spain would try to adapt a generic stadium as a
> >> bullring.
> >
> > what I meant was that
> On Aug 6, 2019, at 12:56 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 6. Aug 2019, at 05:33, Tod Fitch wrote:
>>
>> When I walk down a street collecting house numbers I have no indication of
>> the ZIP code of each building. If you require ZIP codes then I am forced
>>
Le 06.08.19 à 15:49, Tod Fitch a écrit :
> ZIP code for an address is desirable to provide completeness. But making it a
> requirement? No.
I agree. where is the zip code an requirement ?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists
sent from a phone
> On 6. Aug 2019, at 15:49, Tod Fitch wrote:
>
> But if you are asking me to knock on doors in residential areas or ask total
> strangers who look like they might be locals what their ZIP code is as I
> collect non-business addresses you are asking too much.
I didn’t say
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 13:31, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
I may have been misguided here, but to me any narrower pathway in a
> settlement would be suitable for the alley tag. Like those in the pictures
> here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alley
>
I agree. But they may not have names. The one
On Tuesday, 6 August 2019, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 13:31, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> I may have been misguided here, but to me any narrower pathway in a
> > settlement would be suitable for the alley tag. Like those in the pictures
> > here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w
I probably should have used "desirable" instead of "required" (*), but
even then this is not "desirable" for countries where postal code
boundaries are mapped as relations.
(*) please look at the video and see which text is pasted in the
Wikibase definition for addr:street.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 15:16, Philip Barnes wrote:
[Back alleys]
> They have these where I used to visit my grandmother in South Wales,
All over the UK, I suspect. If you're old enough to remember the early
days (late 60s/
early 70s) of "Coronation Street" the houses on the street had a back a
I've been following this thread but haven't chimed in yet. I wanted to talk
to someone that works in State Parks. I contact Neil Lasley with Washington
State Parks and asked him his impression of the discussion and how the
state view parks.
Here is what he had to say.
Good to hear from you! I can
On Sunday, 04 August 2019 15:41:09 HKT Tomas Straupis wrote:
> > Personally, I'd have put residential / living together above unclassified
>
> Interesting. Unclassified was always (more than 10 years) defined
> for "through traffic" which puts it a higher in a hierarchy. From what
> I understand
On Sunday, 04 August 2019 16:46:26 HKT Tomas Straupis wrote:
> 2019-08-04, sk, 11:32 Florian Lohoff rašė:
> > For me unclassified is the same as residential. <...>
>
> Ok, so unclassified vs residential is regionally defined, as I wrote.
>
> But what about service/track?
>
They are not publ
On Sunday, 04 August 2019 23:06:47 HKT Paul Allen wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 at 15:51, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > Where do you take this assumption from? I have never heard before that
> > residential may not be used for through traffic?
>
> Many residential roads are cul-de-sacs. Dead ends. No
On Friday, 02 August 2019 21:32:15 HKT Markus wrote:
> On Friday, August 2, 2019, yo paseopor wrote:
> > The only negative point for public transport v2 scheme was the
> > no-deprecation of the old scheme to avoid duplicities (surely was done
> > this
> > to don't uncomfort people)
> > Salut i tra
19 matches
Mail list logo
