Please take a minute to review the new page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Approval_status
I've made this page, based on the existing list of definitions for the
values of the "status" field in the ValueDescription and
KeyDescription boxes - that's the word "approved", "rejected", "de
facto",
sent from a phone
> On 27. Jul 2019, at 16:19, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> Please take a minute to review the new page
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Approval_status
thank you for taking on this, good work.
Allow me one remark for deprecated and obsolete. Currently it reads:
“
de
We should discuss this at Github to get other ideas and opinions. In
particular, please make a well-reasoned argument for why we need to
supposed boundaries tagged on closed ways at #3785 - try to be concise and
objective.
I think it may be difficult to get protect_class=21 rendered, unless the
ta
I'm on board with a state park specific tag. I find protect class to be a
clunky answer and not entirely humanly intuitive compared to something like
leisure=state_park
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 7:24 PM Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> We should discuss this at Github to get other ideas and opinions. I
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 8:24 PM Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> We should discuss this at Github to get other ideas and opinions. In
> particular, please make a well-reasoned argument for why we need to supposed
> boundaries tagged on closed ways at #3785 - try to be concise and objective.
I'll work
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 9:36 PM Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> I'm on board with a state park specific tag. I find protect class to be a
> clunky answer and not entirely humanly intuitive compared to something like
> leisure=state_park
The non-intuitiveness may prove to be a hidden advantage. At leas
I didn’t realize that all of the protect_class>6 values were invented for
osm. In that case, I see no reason to use any values for protect_class
above 7.
None of the higher values is used very frequently, and it’s impossible for
me to remember which each one means, especially the values from 21 to