sent from a phone
> Am 30.06.2019 um 00:57 schrieb Joseph Eisenberg :
>
> "Please do not map objects that are insignificant (like small plants),
> perishable or mobile (being removable, or unstationary living beings
> like dogs or people), as they are not readily Verifiable"
>
> This is certai
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 at 09:49, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> For example there are boats used as restaurants, they could move, but they
> don’t (in some instances at least).
Got one of those near me. I've mapped it.
> Or mobile fruit or ice cream vendors, which may be there only during the
>
sent from a phone
> Am 01.07.2019 um 12:15 schrieb Paul Allen :
>
> I've altered the "good practice" page to state that it should not be changed
> without consulting
> the wider community. Joking.
while this is ok as a joke, I would also support such a move.
Cheers, Martin
___
Maybe mobile-but-usually-stationary (or with a fixed schedule) amenities and
shops could get an extra tag to denote that property. For example mobile=yes or
something.
POIs with this tag set could be resurveyed more often than others.
Tobias
On July 1, 2019 11:15:32 AM GMT+01:00, Paul Allen w
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 at 11:37, Tobias Zwick wrote:
> Maybe mobile-but-usually-stationary (or with a fixed schedule) amenities
> and shops could get an extra tag to denote that property. For example
> mobile=yes or something.
> POIs with this tag set could be resurveyed more often than others.
>
So
Le 01.07.19 à 12:36, Tobias Zwick a écrit :
> Maybe mobile-but-usually-stationary (or with a fixed schedule) amenities and
> shops could get an extra tag
somes mapper use street_vendor=yes
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 at 11:54, marc marc wrote:
>
> somes mapper use street_vendor=yes
>
Reasonable for the mobile chip shop and mobile burger shop near me. Both
vehicles that are
towed by car into place before they open and towed away when they close.
Reasonable to the
ferry ticket both near me
Do you have any idea for tag name that would overall be better?
1 lip 2019, 17:19 od pla16...@gmail.com:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 at 11:54, marc marc
> Doesn't really work for the restaurant on a boat near me. It's not parked on
> or by a street. It's
> accessed by a footpath, not a street.__
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 at 16:27, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
>
> Do you have any idea for tag name that would overall be better?
>
Nope. Not one that works in all situations. Even street vendor is pushing
it, a little. I'd
normally thinks of a street vendor being somebody with a glorified barrow
(he
sent from a phone
> Am 01.07.2019 um 17:19 schrieb Paul Allen :
>
> Doesn't really work for the restaurant on a boat near me. It's not parked on
> or by a street. It's
> accessed by a footpath, not a street.
IMHO for the restaurant amenity=restaurant is fine and sufficient, if you want
to
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 7:58 PM Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> 2) "Don't map insignificant, perishable and mobile object"
>
> This is certainly true, but it duplicates advice in the previous
> section, so I've removed it.
I think the existing advice was better indeed, so +1 for removing this.
> 1) "C
Be my guest:
intermittent=yes
ephemeral=yes
building=no
permanent=no
movable=yes
stationary=no
caravan=yes
mount=trailer
support=wheels
foundation=no
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_restaurant
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houseboat
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:30 PM Fernando Trebien
wrote:
>
Hi everyone,
The connectivity relations proposal is now in the voting stage! Please
feel free to vote on the proposal or provide any comments on the talk page.
https://wiki.osm.org/Proposed_features/Connectivity
Short summary of this proposal:
This proposal adds a new type of from-via-to relatio
13 matches
Mail list logo
