> On Jun 18, 2019, at 9:46 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Are there any objections to man_made=hitching_point? I think it will be a
> little used item.
If you search for "dog leash hitching post" you find a lot of different kinds
of things - and all of them look like something a
On 18/06/19 20:16, John Willis via Tagging wrote:
On Jun 18, 2019, at 9:46 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
Are there any objections to man_made=hitching_point? I think it will be a
little used item.
If you search for "dog leash hitching post" you find a lot of different kinds
of thin
Javbw
> On Jun 18, 2019, at 7:37 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You have not seen large dogs then. A relatives dog would pull my arm off
> running up hill .. and it was not large...
I'll have to snap a pic of one of the common pet anchor points I have seen (one
company makes all
Hi everyone,
I don't know if it's the right mailing list.
I would like to propose a new tag (if it is not already there). The new tag is
wheelchair = hiking because in Italy many associations are creating mountain
trails for disabled people.
It would be nice to be able to map these paths.
T
18 Jun 2019, 16:28 by andrea.lattm...@ga-2.it:
> Hi everyone,
> I don't know if it's the right mailing list.
>
It is the correct one for discussing tagging, especially new tags! Welcome!
> I would like to propose a new tag (if it is not already there). The new tag
> is wheelchair = hiking beca
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 02:13, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> For the 'centre' of place I tend tot go either for the post office or the
> railway station.
>
I have a vague memory, which a brief search with google is unable to
confirm, that milestones in
Britain gave their distance from t
Le 18.06.19 à 16:28, Andreas Lattmann a écrit :
> mountain trails for disabled people
map the mountain trails as usual (way and/or relation)
and add wheelchair=yes on it (or wheelchair=limited
if ppl need help to use it)
___
Tagging mailing list
Taggin
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 15:32, Andreas Lattmann
wrote:
I don't know if it's the right mailing list.
>
It is.
I would like to propose a new tag (if it is not already there). The new
> tag is wheelchair = hiking because in Italy many associations are creating
> mountain trails for disabled people
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 01:50, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18/06/19 08:50, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> hitching_point=dog|cat|horse|yes if you really feel a need to specify what
> can or cannot be hitched
> there.
>
>
That was silly of me. It would be better to have
hitching_point=post|rai
+1
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 18 jun. 2019 om 16:38 heeft marc marc het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>> Le 18.06.19 à 16:28, Andreas Lattmann a écrit :
>> mountain trails for disabled people
>
> map the mountain trails as usual (way and/or relation)
> and add wheelchair=yes on it (or wheelchair=lim
On 6/18/2019 10:14 AM, Paul Allen wrote:
Are there any objections to man_made=hitching_point? I think it
will be a little used item.
You're probably right there. Not much call for it. And unlikely to
be rendered until we get vector
carto, and maybe not even then. But, analogously to
On 18/06/2019 15:28, Andreas Lattmann wrote:
I would like to propose a new tag (if it is not already there). The new tag is
wheelchair = hiking because in Italy many associations are creating mountain
trails for disabled people.
It would be nice to be able to map these paths.
Would existing
This is a good point and should be the preferred way. For your purpose you should usehighway=pathwheelchair=designated.This tells mappers and other users of OSM data that the highway is a path https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath and designated for wheelchair users https://wiki.op
I would suggest developing a new tag that means, "this authority has
designated this path as accessible by wheelchair users", as that's the
information you actually possess and can communicate. A description of
on-the-ground infrastructure would also be appropriate, though I suspect
there might not
>Where it would be applied? To paths or to route relations?
would be included in the relations
I was thinking about this new tag because often particular wheelchairs are
used, for example: [1] [2]
So if I insert wheelchair = yes what other tag can I use to make it clear that
special equipment
highway=path
> wheelchair=designated
>
This would only be correct if this path is mainly or exclusively for
wheelchair users.
I presume thet the majority of hiking routes for wheelchair users do not
exclude other users, they are likely to be shared with pedestrians,
possibly also cyclists.
I guess
Hi!
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, 16:32 Andreas Lattmann,
wrote:
> I would like to propose a new tag (if it is not already there). The new
> tag is wheelchair = hiking because in Italy many associations are creating
> mountain trails for disabled people.
> It would be nice to be able to map these paths.
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, 18:42 Andreas Lattmann,
wrote:
> would be included in the relations
>
> I was thinking about this new tag because often particular wheelchairs are
> used, for example: [1] [2]
>
> So if I insert wheelchair = yes what other tag can I use to make it clear
> that special equipme
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, 18:44 Volker Schmidt, wrote:
> highway=path
>> wheelchair=designated
>>
> This would only be correct if this path is mainly or exclusively for
> wheelchair users.
> I presume thet the majority of hiking routes for wheelchair users do not
> exclude other users, they are likely
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 18 giu 2019, alle ore 16:40, Paul Allen ha
> scritto:
>
> If you add
> wheelchair=yes to a hiking trail it is implicit that it is for hiking in a
> wheelchair.
we could use wheelchair=designated
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/wheelchair#value
it seem
>IMO wheelchair=yes means accessible for most basic wheelchairs.
For the paths that are accessible with normal wheelchairs, I have no doubt: I
would tag them with wheelchair = yes, it is on the paths that need special
wheelchairs (4x4, with the help of people etc.) that I don't know how to tag
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, 19:36 Andreas Lattmann,
wrote:
> >IMO wheelchair=yes means accessible for most basic wheelchairs.
>
> For the paths that are accessible with normal wheelchairs, I have no
> doubt: I would tag them with wheelchair = yes, it is on the paths that need
> special wheelchairs (4x4,
Le 18.06.19 à 22:07, Markus a écrit :
> If you want to use a new tag for special wheelchairs
the example has little to do with wheelchairs, a paraplegic,
a blind person, a patient could just as easily go for a walk
the itinerary seems to describe + the activity of an association
or group of people
> IMO wheelchair=yes means accessible for most basic wheelchairs.
Yes, but it's something that is frequently difficult to estimate. In
interviews with wheelchair users, many will give strong opinions about what
they personally think is accessible and their responses vary more than most
people expe
>the example has little to do with wheelchairs, a paraplegic,
>a blind person, a patient could just as easily go for a walk
I understand that I did not explain the situation well. I have seen that
recently there have been activities that rent 4x4 wheelchairs at the beginning
of the journey. The
25 matches
Mail list logo
