> 1. Combined foot/cycle crossing - a side path from a combined
> foot/cycleway onto a very lightly trafficked suburban street. Marked
> with signs bearing the silhouette of a bicycle about 50 m in advance
> of the crossing. No markings on the pavement. (This crossing is part
> of my daily commute.
On 5/12/2019 8:19 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2019 at 19:28, Tony Shield mailto:tony.shield...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Like the idea.
delivery_contact might be better.
I prefer delivery over contact
Maybe (using our local companies as an eg)
delivery:ubereats="url"
deliv
sent from a phone
> On 13. May 2019, at 18:06, Jmapb wrote:
>
> I'm reluctant to recommend the OSM database as the best place to collect
> links to the individual restaurant pages of various delivery services. I
> prefer this "delivery:partner=*" recommendation on
> https://wiki.openstreetm
On 5/13/2019 12:35 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
verifiable facts about a restaurant (or other feature) might not
always be verifiable in the feature itself, but still be verifiable
for everybody interested in it (elsewhere). If the URL is accessible
for everybody it would satisfy the verifiabi
Le 13.05.19 à 18:35, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
>> there's no obvious way to indicate that the restaurant also does
>> deliveries itself
>
> Right, maybe we should introduce a code for this to be added along the
> delivery partners, something like “self”? (naturally this would break if
> a c
Forgot that part:
> On my walk yesterday, other than the implied crossing at every
> intersection (but see "don't map local law") I noted the following:
I do generally map crossings as long as they have lowered kerbs, like here:
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/558999688670609448/577570543
Wow, thanks for all that, Jason!
I don't use any of these delivery services myself, nor know any restaurant
owners, so wasn't aware that sort of thing happened, although I knew they
were more expensive than picking your meal up yourself.
So, yes, delete the URL & only go with what is on the resta
On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 05:10, wrote:
I must admit that I only map crossings when they are between formed
footpaths eg
https://www.google.com/maps/@-28.070784,153.4361817,3a,75y,133.97h,57.19t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1saeYx4cpvnikG8KXcdh0pGw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553154
sent from a phone
On 14. May 2019, at 02:24, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/558999688670609448/577570543851536401/unknown.png
>
> That one, I would have terminated the crossing at the marked road, rather
> than taking it to the other side
the lowered ke
