Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> I still think it's easiest for us to approve the fairly popular tag
> "camp_site=camp_pitch", which is already supported by some editors,
> since the alternatives also have some disadvantages.
+1
--
Das Internet ist kein rechtsfreier Raum, das Internet ist aber auch
k
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crossing%3Dmarked
Hello, fellow tagging enthusiasts! At long last, and after many discussions
on a variety of fora, I am putting this proposal forward in the hopes of
getting feedback, making any necessary revisions, and then moving to a vote.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crossing:signals
Hello fellow tagging enthusiasts!
This proposal suggests the deprecation of crossing=traffic_signals and
replacing it with crossing:signals=yes, i.e. placing pedestrian
signalization on a dedicated tag that is separate from cr
Two spontanous reactions
1) You cannot deprecate a tagging that is used 750k times
(crossing=uncontrolled) or 570k times (crossing=traffic_signals)
2) please define the terms you use.
What is "signalization"?
I know these terms: traffic signals, road marking (=horizontal traffic
signs), signs (=
On 07.05.19 23:08, Nick Bolten wrote:
> This proposal suggests the deprecation of crossing=traffic_signals and
> replacing it with crossing:signals=yes, i.e. placing pedestrian
> signalization on a dedicated tag that is separate from crossing=* values.
I agree with separating orthogonal characteri
> 1) You cannot deprecate a tagging that is used 750k times
(crossing=uncontrolled) or 570k times (crossing=traffic_signals)
This proposal does not deprecate crossing=uncontrolled.
For the latter: why not? The tag is, in technical terms, garbage, and other
tags in relatively high use have been de
> However, it seems odd to "demote" traffic signals to a sub-tag when their
presence or absence is perhaps the biggest influence on the crossing's
overall character.
I agree that it's not ideal to have to make these kinds of choices about
"demoting". In case it's helpful, this is my original ratio
On 07/05/2019 22:46, Volker Schmidt wrote:
Two spontanous reactions
1) You cannot deprecate a tagging that is used 750k times
(crossing=uncontrolled) or 570k times (crossing=traffic_signals)
In principle, why do you think it can't be performed?
___
