Hi Graeme,
Thanks for asking. I've left an answer in the wiki, which I likewise repeat
here.
"I think it would be convenient to leave this to be determined by people with
local knowledge. It should depend on what is the more common denomination. In
Germany, some abbreviations are the commonly
On 08.04.19 04:02, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> I noticed that the original proposal for the key "Club" had 13 votes in
> favor and 5 votes against, therefore it should have been considered
> "rejected" rather than "approved."
That vote happened in 2011. Back then, a simple majority was considered
su
sent from a phone
> On 8. Apr 2019, at 04:02, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>
> I noticed that the original proposal for the key "Club" had 13 votes in favor
> and 5 votes against, therefore it should have been considered "rejected"
> rather than "approved." I've made a note of this in the proposa
Thanks
Yep, that all makes good sense.
Good luck with the vote!
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
I didn’t know this, thank you for the correction.
Is this documented somewhere on the wiki about proposals?
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:08 AM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 8. Apr 2019, at 04:02, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
> >
> > I noticed that the original proposal
sent from a phone
> On 9. Apr 2019, at 00:05, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>
> Is this documented somewhere on the wiki about proposals?
it is visible from the history:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposal_process&type=revision&diff=1150885&oldid=1143140
but I agree it could
Thanks! I’ve undone the changes to the club wiki page, and I will add a
note about the historical proposal voting
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 7:16 AM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> On 9. Apr 2019, at 00:05, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> Is this documented somewhere on the wik
