Re: [Tagging] Horse mounting steps compared to horse walker

Apr 1, 2019, 2:42 AM by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > Ok .. I have a draft for mounting blocks > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/mounting_block > > > Think I have the main points downs.. I'll leave it for

[Tagging] Feature Proposal -- RFC -- service=irregular

Hi everyone, I'm proposing the tag service=irregular for tram, light rail, underground and other railway tracks not used for regular scheduled passenger services, but only for diversions or shortcuts. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:service%3Dirregular Any feedback (on

Re: [Tagging] historic=archaeological_site with site_type=rock_art, rock_painting definitions

On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 06:47, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Within OSM 'we' could adopt that rock_art is where both carving and > painting are used together? That would distinguish it from either of the > above. > > > There are some 22 uses of site_type=rock_art, I think most of them wou

Re: [Tagging] historic=archaeological_site with site_type=rock_art, rock_painting definitions

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 7:55 AM Paul Allen wrote: > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 06:47, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Within OSM 'we' could adopt that rock_art is where both carving and >> painting are used together? That would distinguish it from either of the >> above. >> >> >> There are

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal -- RFC -- service=irregular

Am Mo., 1. Apr. 2019 um 11:55 Uhr schrieb Markus : > Hi everyone, > > I'm proposing the tag service=irregular for tram, light rail, > underground and other railway tracks not used for regular scheduled > passenger services, but only for diversions or shortcuts. > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Horse mounting steps compared to horse walker

Hi Could you have a look at this - https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1362124#contributions and have confidence that this historic grade II mounting block will fit into the schema? Its not presently in use as it is in a school yard. TonyS999 On 01/04/2019 08:16, Ma

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal -- RFC -- service=irregular

Hi Martin, On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 18:21, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > this should get a different name, many people would call their tram, light > rail or underground service "irregular" (from a subjective point of view: you > wait for a means and it arrives too late). Not sure how to better c

Re: [Tagging] Horse mounting steps compared to horse walker

On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 19:23, Tony Shield wrote: and have confidence that this historic grade II mounting block will fit > into the schema? Its not presently in use as it is in a school yard. > I don't know about the schema, but whatever tags you settle on, don't forget to add: heritage=2 herita

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal -- RFC -- service=irregular

Hi What about track=service? (key track without 's') :Stefan Am Mo., 1. Apr. 2019 um 20:35 Uhr schrieb Markus : > > Hi Martin, > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 18:21, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > > > this should get a different name, many people would call their tram, light > > rail or undergrou

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal -- RFC -- service=irregular

Hi Stefan, On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 20:51, Stefan Keller wrote: > > What about track=service? (key track without 's') That doesn't seem to fit well with the other service=* tags (e.g. service=yard) that are already in use: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service#Railways _

Re: [Tagging] Horse mounting steps compared to horse walker

As a mounting block? disused:amenity=mounting_block As a historic object? historic=mounting_block ..or historic=yes Depending on what feature you want to map. You could map both, say one as a node the other as a small circular area. This would follow the OSM guide of  'one feature, one OSM ent

Re: [Tagging] Bus rapid transit: service=bus vs service=busway vs no service tag

Then how to tag brt-bus-only road that ban regular buses? 在 2019年3月29日週五 05:40，Martin Koppenhoefer 寫道： > > > sent from a phone > > > On 28. Mar 2019, at 21:07, Phake Nick wrote: > > > > A problem with using something like service=bus is that it implies all > buses can use it but in many cases B