вс, 24 февр. 2019 г. в 02:56, Paul Allen :
> Yes, we can merge the tags and have drain for both.
I'm still wondering why "drain", not "ditch", should be kept in the case of
merging the tags.
Cheers,
Eugene
вс, 24 февр. 2019 г. в 02:56, Paul Allen :
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 at 23:33, Hufkratzer w
Hello !
I think we should decorrelate the attributes of a road : its administrative
class, its importance in the road network (at least 5 levels), its physical
characteristics (motorway-like, two large lanes, link=yes ...), possibly
its traffic characteristics.
So we can tag a secondary motorway
... for the unclassified / residential issue : highway_level=5 or 6 and
highway_physics=countryside or town
djakk
Le dim. 24 févr. 2019 à 15:25, djakk djakk a écrit :
> Hello !
>
> I think we should decorrelate the attributes of a road : its
> administrative class, its importance in the road
... furthermore, highway_level can be used to classify footway or cycleway
:)
For example, in a park, some footway are “unclassified” (or
highway_level=5) and some are “primary” (or highway_level=1). Very useful
to render long-range trail.
djakk
Le dim. 24 févr. 2019 à 15:44, djakk djakk a écr
On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, 01:24 Graeme Fitzpatrick,
wrote:
>
> Bins in public areas (parks, public toilets etc) are intended to have
> syringes, with needles attached, disposed of into them. I guess someone
> could also put an ampoule in there, but I don't think most people
> (hopefully) using these b
It reminds me my road_level proposal for some reason.
24.02.2019 17:48 tarihinde djakk djakk yazdı:
> ... furthermore, highway_level can be used to classify footway or
> cycleway :)
>
> For example, in a park, some footway are “unclassified” (or
> highway_level=5) and some are “primary” (or highwa
Erkin, when did you make this proposal ?
Julien
Le dim. 24 févr. 2019 à 18:31, Erkin Alp Güney a
écrit :
> It reminds me my road_level proposal for some reason.
>
> 24.02.2019 17:48 tarihinde djakk djakk yazdı:
> > ... furthermore, highway_level can be used to classify footway or
> > cycleway
Okay I found it ! May 2018 ;)
Julien “djakk”
Le dim. 24 févr. 2019 à 19:11, djakk djakk a écrit :
> Erkin, when did you make this proposal ?
>
> Julien
>
>
> Le dim. 24 févr. 2019 à 18:31, Erkin Alp Güney a
> écrit :
>
>> It reminds me my road_level proposal for some reason.
>>
>> 24.02.2019
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 00:27, djakk djakk wrote:
> Hello !
>
> I think we should decorrelate the attributes of a road : its
> administrative class, its importance in the road network (at least 5
> levels), its physical characteristics (motorway-like, two large lanes,
> link=yes ...), possibly its
On 09/02/2019 19:47, Sergio Manzi wrote:
The thing is quite obviously fruit of immagination, creativity, and/or
delusion: there surely isn't out there such a concoction of toll
booths (/many of them/), bunkers, town halls, dams, towers,
campgrounds, etc.
As Simon has already mentioned thi
sent from a phone
> On 24. Feb 2019, at 22:20, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> Replace the existing highway= types (=motorway; =primary etc) with highway=1
> to =5?, with 1 being the existing =motorway, down to 5 being all the minor
> streets in a town.
rather than replacing the highway tags
11 matches
Mail list logo
