Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 113, Issue 29, Co-ordinate sets vs. background informations

Am 07.02.2019 um 16:01 schrieb tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org: > > 2. Re: A general problem: Co-ordinate sets vs. background > informations (marc marc) > 3. Re: A general problem: Co-ordinate sets vs. background > informations (Andy Townsend) > 4. Nope | Re: A general problem: Co-o

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 113, Issue 31 Co-ordinate sets vs. background informations

Am 08.02.2019 um 00:44 schrieb tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org: > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:01:28 +1100 > From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Tagging] A general problem: Co-ordinate sets vs. > background informations > Message

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 113, Issue 29, Co-ordinate sets vs. background informations

sent from a phone > On 8. Feb 2019, at 09:55, Ulrich Lamm wrote: > > Mighty people in OSM, at least one in Germany, punish mappers, if they use > database contents available under Creative Commons license, though source > tags fit Creative Commons conditions, of course. compatibility of se

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 113, Issue 31 Co-ordinate sets vs. background informations

On 08/02/19 20:37, Ulrich Lamm wrote: Am 08.02.2019 um 00:44 schrieb tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org : Message: 2 Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:01:28 +1100 From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > To:tagging@openstreetmap.org

[Tagging] man_made=storage_tank for open containers?

Hi list, Does a man_made=storage_tank need to be closed? Or do we have (or require) a tag for open containers, for example open slurry storage containers [^1]? [^1]: Thanks Marku

Re: [Tagging] man_made=storage_tank for open containers?

have the feeling that we have discussed this before. On the fly I find these two hreads: [Tagging] Wastewater Plants [Talk-de] Klärbecken... (in German :-( ) Volker On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 17:43, Markus wrote: > Hi list, > > Does a man_made=storage_tank need to be closed? Or do we have (or >

Re: [Tagging] man_made=storage_tank for open containers?

On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 16:43, Markus wrote: Does a man_made=storage_tank need to be closed? Or do we have (or > require) a tag for open containers, for example open slurry storage > containers [^1]? > Not sure. Depends what you mean by "tank." However, there's a problem with the rendering of ma

Re: [Tagging] man_made=storage_tank for open containers?

On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 18:19, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > have the feeling that we have discussed this before. On the fly I find these > two hreads: > > [Tagging] Wastewater Plants (After a long search in the archive ...) Apparently it was even me asking the same question – shame on me! https://l

Re: [Tagging] man_made=storage_tank for open containers?

On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 18:27, Paul Allen wrote: > > Not sure. Depends what you mean by "tank." However, there's a problem with > the rendering > of man_made=storage_tank whether or not you consider it must be closed: it > renders with the > symbol for a silo. Which is very wrong. Yeah, I know,

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 113, Issue 33 Co-ordinate sets vs. background informations = ODbL vs. CC

ay last weeks or months, until a correction is displayed. > > > Cheers, Martin > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190208/bbd2eefa/attachment-0001.

Re: [Tagging] man_made=storage_tank for open containers?

On 9/2/19 6:05 am, Markus wrote: On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 18:19, Volker Schmidt wrote: However, the question has remained unanswered. [Talk-de] Klärbecken... (in German :-( ) Sorry, but i'm unable to find that thread. Strangely enough, Google doesn't seem to index everything on lists.openst

Re: [Tagging] man_made=storage_tank for open containers?

I did create new thread about including other features in wastewater treatment facilities. Unfortunately I have been side track on other issues, not necessarily OSM issue, but life in general. I do plan to continue exploring how to tag the various features in wastewater treatment facilities in the

[Tagging] Mountain Ranges

Hi, There appear to be 2 competing tags for use with mountain ranges. Neither have any wiki documentation! A) place=region, region=mountain_range Mostly relations with outer ways only. B) natural=mountain_range Again as relations - with outer ways and at least some with nodes representi

Re: [Tagging] Mountain Ranges

Thanks for working on this. I had been meaning to reopen the proposal. No need to introduce a new key. natural=mountain_range is fine, and has been in use. > To map: > - as a node - centred on the area > - a simple open way along hte spine of the range Yes, both of these are good. If a way is us

Re: [Tagging] man_made=storage_tank for open containers?

In my dialect of American English, a tank would normally be fully enclosed, while an open container for liquids would be a pool or basin or pond? I’d like to keep “tank” for covered features. On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 8:21 AM Clifford Snow wrote: > I did create new thread about including other feat

[Tagging] Micronations

Does OSM recognise, & allow the mapping of, micronations as defined areas? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micronation Was looking for something completely different :-) & just found this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653287455#map=15/38.0034/-87.6183 showing the "nation" of Pitchfork Union http

Re: [Tagging] Mountain Ranges

The thing that would worry me about tagging it as a way is the length. As you know, the Great Dividing Range is 3500k long, which would well & truly stretch things! Thanks Graeme ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstre

Re: [Tagging] man_made=storage_tank for open containers?

On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 at 05:07, Markus wrote: > If man_made=storage_tank has been used for closed containers, it might be > better to find another > tag to not loose that tag's meaning. > Are you storing solids or liquids? For solids, bunker_silo (which I have never before heard them referred to a

[Tagging] "Map features" page language

Just looking at the Map Features page & noticed that under Highway - Special Road Types https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Special_road_types the description for "Escape" has been changed to apparently Russian? I can't see how it's been changed? Could some knowledgeable person :-) p

Re: [Tagging] Mountain Ranges

Mountain ranges of continental length are usually made up of shorter, named ranges. I’d start by tagging the shorter ones. For extremely long ranges we would neeed to use relations, as is done for the 5000km long “Interstate” motorways in the USA and long rivers in all countries. Unfortunately,

Re: [Tagging] "Map features" page language

On 09/02/19 12:09, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: Just looking at the Map Features page & noticed that under Highway - Special Road Types https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Special_road_types the description for "Escape" has been changed to apparently Russian? I can't see how it's been

Re: [Tagging] Micronations

On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 10:54:16 +1000 Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > Does OSM recognise, & allow the mapping of, micronations as defined > areas? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micronation > > Was looking for something completely different :-) & just found this > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653287

Re: [Tagging] Micronations

On 09/02/19 16:18, Mark Wagner wrote: On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 10:54:16 +1000 Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: Does OSM recognise, & allow the mapping of, micronations as defined areas? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micronation Was looking for something completely different :-) & just found this https://w