On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 20:57:04 +0100
Peter Elderson wrote:
> Copying from an earlier response: Designated starting point for
> multiple routes into a nature area. There is a designed marking pole
> or stele, information boards, seats or benches, free parking space
> nearby. This one is in a small v
Please note that the description of official TOPs in Nederland is not
intended as a limitative requirement for trailheads around the globe.
If we would mark every access point to a route as a trailhead, Nederland
would be covered with trailheads, and nobody would have any use for the
information.
I just did some work on a hierarchy of hiking routes. Can't be done with Id
or Potlatch, the only available tool is JOSM and even with JOSM you'll have
to do extra steps not to break things.
Reverse is seldom a problem with hiking. Nevertheless, one iwn uses some
sections of a national trail (which
Peter Elderson wrote:
> I just did some work on a hierarchy of hiking routes. Can't be done with
> Id or Potlatch
What specifically can't be done in P2?
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f5258744.html
___
Tagging mailing
Sorry, I assumed Potlatch would work approximately similar to Id. Can it
easily sort/reverse ways within relations, move elements between relations,
create and manipulate superroutes, and keep all the routes (hiking,
cycling, PT) happy when removing/splitting/extending ways?
Op do 3 jan. 2019 om 1
Peter Elderson wrote:
> Sorry, I assumed Potlatch would work approximately similar to Id.
If you're addressing a mailing list with 551 subscribers, could I suggest
you take a few minutes to actually research your statements before posting?
> Can it easily sort/reverse ways within relations, move
I wonder why it is under "highway", it seems more related to "tourism"
/ "information".
Another problem I see is that there is no other definition for
trailheads in The Netherlands than "location being picked by the
tourist agency as trailhead" or better "location being designated by
the tourist a
First point: you are right and again, I am sorry.
Second: What about the same question without the “easily”?
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 3 jan. 2019 om 13:10 heeft Richard Fairhurst het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Peter Elderson wrote:
>> Sorry, I assumed Potlatch would work approximately similar t
On 03/01/2019 14:37, Peter Elderson wrote:
What about the same question without the “easily”?
I occasionally (especially with a DWG hat on) have to modify relations
on a member-by-member basis, and depending on what exactly what you want
to do, JOSM, P2 or something else might be the best for
8X--
Bryan Housel bhousel at gmail.com
Thu Jan 3 04:39:03 UTC 2019We discussed it here on this list last year.
You started the thread even, so you can’t pretend like you "just
realized” it.
I even asked people to update the wiki.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipe
Forgot to mention :
" it follows what `service:bicycle:*` does."
is not true.
And if you introduce a new system,
you should also explain the namespace structure.
And not just create a hard to find "notice"
which isn't linked to from the affected existing tags
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ke
Well, I regularly edit and maintain a lot of routes, route hierarchies and node
networks. Id is fine for a few basic things, adding and editing tags, combining
two routes in a superroute. Now try checking and sorting routes from hundreds
up to thousands of members, including forward and backward
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 3:32 PM Xavier wrote:
>
> By "interstate highway crossovers" I mean small bits of road that
> connect the two carriage ways of a US interstate highway and are signed
> as "Authorized Vehicles Only" (at least in Virginia they are signed
> this way).
>
> An example is here:
13 matches
Mail list logo
